California green vote could hurt voluntary CO2 market

The sun rises over a windmill farm in Palm Springs, California November 26, 2005. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

The sun rises over a windmill farm in Palm Springs, California November 26, 2005.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

LONDON | Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:57am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - A ballot measure to suspend a Californian global warming law could stall activity in the voluntary carbon market if it is passed next week, market players said on Wednesday.

On November 2, Californian voters will be asked to approve Proposition 23, which would suspend the 2006 California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) until the state unemployment drops to 5.5 percent or less for four consecutive quarters.

If voted in, the measure could put a state renewable energy target on hold, as well as the regional emissions trading market called the Western Climate Initiative (WCI).

If AB 32 is suspended, California may not to be able to participate in the WCI, which aims to create a giant emissions market from 2012 covering California, New Mexico, British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario from 2012.

A new poll last week suggested 48 percent of likely voters oppose the proposition, with 37 percent in support, leaving some 15 percent still undecided.

"It would be detrimental to confidence in the voluntary carbon market were California to withdraw from AB 32," said Grattan MacGiffin, managing director of GTE Global Trading Ltd.

"Without the Golden State's participation, the WCI would lose its depth and therefore cease to be regarded as a decent market," he added.

SUSPICION

The WCI is also seen as a bellwether for a federal U.S. scheme, which faces tough opposition in the Senate.

New Mexico has hinted it will drop out of the WCI if California fails to participate, leaving Canadian provinces to look at a national approach to reducing emissions.

Ontario's environmental commissioner said last week that the WCI would suffer a major blow by losing California, possibly impacting the international carbon market.

The global voluntary market operates outside regulated emissions reduction scheme and relies on businesses and individuals to offset their greenhouse gas emissions voluntarily.

Compliance schemes can help raise awareness about emissions trading in general, helping to boost the offset market.

"We have historically seen a huge suspicion in the U.S. toward emissions trading and especially offsetting. If Prop. 23 goes through, it would send a very bad signal to the voluntary market which is still very thin (there)," said Sascha Lafeld, executive board member at carbon asset manager First Climate.

"Apart from a few big players there is no real activity there," he added.

(Editing by Sue Thomas)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
EarlRichards wrote:
PROP 26 is just as destructive as PROP 23. Prop 26 is a treacherous, Big Oil rip-off, which “passes the buck” from oil corporation, clean-up fees to the public’s taxes, which will pay the oil recycling fees, the materials hazards fees and other fees. If you do not understand the ambiguities and the intrigues behind Prop 26, then, vote no. Shell, BP and Exxon mobil are silent partners behind Prop 26. Power to the people.

Oct 27, 2010 9:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JDoddsGW wrote:
So prop23 is supported by two oil companes.
Then there is the opposition, a few dozen Wall Street Venture Capitalists who will lose money if the State and its taxpayers can no longer contribute to their obscene profits, by subsidizing more expensive alternate fuels.
Maybe the taxpayer can lower his utility bills if he is not paying for more expensive electricity.
As for the CO2, when you add more CO2 every evening, the temperature goes down not up. It s a lie that more CO2 causes more warming. Proven wrong every night. Or don’t you believe your own common sense?

Oct 27, 2010 3:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.