Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

New York Judge rules 6-year-old can be sued

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:53pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A girl can be sued over accusations she ran over an elderly woman with her training bicycle when she was 4 years old, a New York Supreme Court justice has ruled.

The ruling by King's County Supreme Court Justice Paul Wooten stems from an incident in April 2009 when Juliet Breitman and Jacob Kohn, both aged four, struck an 87-year-old pedestrian, Claire Menagh, with their training bikes.

Menagh underwent surgery for a fractured hip and died three months later.

In a ruling made public late Thursday, the judge dismissed arguments by Breitman's lawyer that the case should be dismissed because of her young age. He ruled that she is old enough to be sued and the case can proceed.

The decision also will allow for the lawsuit to proceed against the Kohn family for the incident.

"For infants above the age of 4, there is no bright-line rule," Wooten wrote, adding that the girl had been three months shy of turning 5.

Wooten also disagreed with the lawyer's assertion that Juliet Breitman should not be held responsible because her mother was supervising the children at the time.

"A parent's presence alone does not give a reasonable child carte blanche to engage in risky behavior such as running across a street," Wooten wrote. He added that "the term 'supervising' is too vague to hold meaning here."

Wooten concluded by writing that there was no indication or evidence that "another child of similar age and capacity under the circumstances could not have reasonably appreciated the danger of riding a bicycle into an elderly woman."

(Reporting by Bernd Debusmann Jr.; editing by Jim Marshall)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (21)
DaBond wrote:
Unified Court Judge Paul Wooten – Due Process, Rule of Law & U.S. Constitution Be Damned! We need to get rid of the judge. But how do you do that?

Oct 29, 2010 6:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Morescade wrote:
What comes next, a new born getting sued for puking on someone’s designer clothing? Or maybe for having a leaky diaper when they get held on somebody’s lap? The key words here (besides the kids age -4yo) are training bike, a trainee by definition doesn’t have full control of the TRAINING device being operated wether they are 4yo or 40yo.

Oct 29, 2010 8:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BurnerJack wrote:
Boy howdy! Just remember that a judge used to be a lawyer. I guess the idea is that this provides additional income for his lawyer friends.
Supervision is looking out for the welfare and actions of those under supervision. If anything, the mother could be held responsible for not curtailing any actions that by reasonable
and prudent observation be deemed unsafe.
toddlers in swimming pools without assistance could fall under that heading or say a 4 year old giving a baby a plastic bag to play with.
This judge should have a job in academia where sound judgement is notoriously absent.

Oct 29, 2010 10:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.