U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Law curbs McDonald's Happy Meal toys

Related Topics

Two McDonald's Happy Meal with toy watches fashioned after the characters Donkey and Puss in Boots from the movie ''Shrek Forever After'' are pictured in Los Angeles June 22, 2010. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Two McDonald's Happy Meal with toy watches fashioned after the characters Donkey and Puss in Boots from the movie ''Shrek Forever After'' are pictured in Los Angeles June 22, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mario Anzuoni

LOS ANGELES | Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:38pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to pass a law that cracks down on the popular practice of giving away free toys with unhealthy restaurant meals for children.

San Francisco's Board of Supervisors passed the law on Tuesday on a veto-proof 8-to-3 vote. It takes effect on December 1.

The law, like an ordinance passed earlier this year in nearby Santa Clara County, would require that restaurant kids' meals meet certain nutritional standards before they could be sold with toys.

Opponents of the law include the National Restaurant Association and McDonald's Corp, which used its now wildly popular Happy Meal to pioneer the use of free toys to market directly to children.

"We are extremely disappointed with today's decision. It's not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for," McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud said in a statement.

"Getting a toy with a kid's meal is just one part of a fun, family experience at McDonald's," Proud said.

The San Francisco law would allow toys to be given away with kids' meals that have less than 600 calories, contain fruits and vegetables, and include beverages without excessive fat or sugar.

Backers of the ordinance say it aims to promote healthy eating habits while combating childhood obesity.

"Our children are sick. Rates of obesity in San Francisco are disturbingly high, especially among children of color," said San Francisco Supervisor Eric Mar, who sponsored the measure.

"This is a challenge to the restaurant industry to think about children's health first and join the wide range of local restaurants that have already made this commitment," Mar said.

HAPPY MEALS IN THE HOT SEAT

Fifteen percent of American children are overweight or obese -- which puts them at risk of developing heart disease, diabetes and cancer, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In some states, the childhood obesity rate is over 30 percent.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest this summer threatened to sue McDonald's if it did not stop using Happy Meal toys to lure children into its restaurants. A lawyer for that group said it is on track to file the lawsuit in the next several weeks.

McDonald's debuted the Happy Meal in the United States in 1979 with toys like the "McDoodler" stencil and the "McWrist" wallet. Modern offerings have included themed items from popular films like "Shrek" or sought-after toys like Transformers, Legos or miniature Ty Beanie Babies.

In 2006, the latest year for which data is available, fast-food companies led by McDonald's spent more than $520 million on advertising and toys to promote meals for children, according to a U.S. Federal Trade Commission report.

When the efforts of other food and beverage companies were included, promotional spending aimed at children topped $1.6 billion.

(Reporting by Lisa Baertlein; Editing by Richard Chang)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Ashau wrote:
They want to outlaw Big Macs but at the same time legalize drugs? Hypocrites.

If they’re worried about unhealthy products and activities, why have they not also pass a law against the sale of cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco products in San Francisco? Consumption of those products is at least as big a health issue (not just to the user but to those around the user as well) and the use of these items costs many millions more each year than the consumption of Big Macs.

Why have they not passed a law forbidding sex without a condom in San Francisco? How many people die or are incapacitated by STDs each year. If they’re going to intrude on our private lives and take away our freedoms of choice, they might as well go all the way and ban the use of everything that’s unhealthy…including recreational drugs.

Nov 03, 2010 2:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ashau wrote:
They want to outlaw Big Macs but at the same time legalize drugs? Hypocrites.

If they’re worried about unhealthy products and activities, why have they not also pass a law against the sale of cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco products in San Francisco? Consumption of those products is at least as big a health issue (not just to the user but to those around the user as well) and the use of these items costs many millions more each year than the consumption of Big Macs.

Why have they not passed a law forbidding sex without a condom in San Francisco? How many people die or are incapacitated by STDs each year. If they’re going to intrude on our private lives and take away our freedoms of choice, they might as well go all the way and ban the use of everything that’s unhealthy…including recreational drugs.

Nov 03, 2010 2:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ashau wrote:
They want to outlaw Big Macs but at the same time legalize drugs? Hypocrites.

If they’re worried about unhealthy products and activities, why have they not also pass a law against the sale of cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco products in San Francisco? Consumption of those products is at least as big a health issue (not just to the user but to those around the user as well) and the use of these items costs many millions more each year than the consumption of Big Macs.

Why have they not passed a law forbidding sex without a condom in San Francisco? How many people die or are incapacitated by STDs each year. If they’re going to intrude on our private lives and take away our freedoms of choice, they might as well go all the way and ban the use of everything that’s unhealthy…including recreational drugs.

Nov 03, 2010 2:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.