Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Bernanke says low rates won't stoke inflation

WASHINGTON | Wed Nov 3, 2010 8:45pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, fresh from announcing new measures to support the U.S. economy, said the central bank's aggressive monetary policy will not spark unwanted inflation in the future.

Bernanke, in an opinion piece to be published on Thursday in the Washington Post, argued that the bigger risks facing the country right now are an unemployment rate that remains too high and inflation readings that are uncomfortably low.

"Inflation that is too low can pose risks to the economy -- especially when the economy is struggling. In the most extreme case, very low inflation can morph into deflation, which can contribute to long periods of economic stagnation," Bernanke wrote.

The Fed on Wednesday announced it would buy an additional $600 billion in government bonds through the middle of next year, a widely telegraphed decision that has been accompanied by some doubts about its likely effectiveness.

Opponents of the measure say it is only sowing the seeds of future inflation, a concern Bernanke said was "overstated" because the economy was currently operating so far below its full potential.

"Even absent (deflation) risks, low and falling inflation indicate that the economy has considerable spare capacity, implying that there is scope for monetary policy to support further gains in employment without risking economic overheating," the Fed chief said.

Bernanke also beat back worries about whether asset purchases and their effect on financial markets can have a discernible positive effect on U.S. economic activity, which expanded at a meager 2 percent annualized clip in the third quarter.

By boosting the prices of stocks and corporate bonds, he said, the Fed's bond buying can -- and already has to some extent -- stimulate the sort of investment that will begin to put a dent on the nation's 9.6 percent unemployment rate.

"Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth," he said. "Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending."

Still, Bernanke acknowledged that the idea of conducting monetary policy through longer-dated asset buying is relatively unfamiliar, adding that this has caused the Fed to proceed cautiously.

He reiterated the notion that the central bank has the tools it needs to withdraw monetary stimulus if inflation looks to be rising too rapidly.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
hempstead1944 wrote:
Doesn’t require a rocket scientist to know why….Bernanke can make all the money in the world available BUT the banks are not going to lend it to folks who do not have jobs and can show no plausible way they could pay it back….
Come on people…use some common sense!!!!!

Nov 03, 2010 8:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
I do not understand the government’s logic here. QE will give more liquidity to banks at extremely low rates and they will use this money to fuel speculation in the stock market or elsewhere instead of lending it. End result will be a cheaper dollar with no benefits. Instead, why not cut taxes and increase the deficit which also will end up in a cheaper dollar but will put money directly in the pockets of consumers to spend or save. This QE plus trickle down theory sound like a recipe for failure.

Nov 03, 2010 8:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
The Federal Reserve should require congressional approval to print money not backed by treasuries. Qualitative Easing erodes our savings by decreasing the value of the dollar. Qualitative Easing also spurs inflation, and decreases the value of foreign debt, making the greenback a less attractive default currency. China and other nations have already called for the creation of a new international currency because American sovereign debt makes qualitative easing too tempting, given that we are not doing what is necessary to live within our means. Easy money from nowhere isn’t the solution to Obama’s 2012 reelection chances, and the voter’s reaction to the potpourri of pork barrel spending that was the “stimulus“ should have convinced him of that. Qualitative easing is a tax on everyone because it decreases the value of our savings, in the hope of pumping up available currency volume, spending and tax revenue. This is fairy tale economics, and that prime rate needs to increase lest we find ourselves in Japan’s unenviable position of pervasive economic stagnation.

Nov 03, 2010 8:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.