Look out, your medicine is watching you

NEW YORK Mon Nov 8, 2010 5:29pm EST

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Novartis AG plans to seek regulatory approval within 18 months for a pioneering tablet containing an embedded microchip, bringing the concept of "smart-pill" technology a step closer.

The initial program will use one of the Swiss firm's established drugs taken by transplant patients to avoid organ rejection. But Trevor Mundel, global head of development, believes the concept can be applied to many other pills.

"We are taking forward this transplant drug with a chip and we hope within the next 18 months to have something that we will be able to submit to the regulators, at least in Europe," Mundel told the Reuters Health Summit in New York.

"I see the promise as going much beyond that," he added.

Novartis agreed in January to spend $24 million to secure access to chip-in-a-pill technology developed by privately owned Proteus Biomedical of Redwood City, California, putting it ahead of rivals.

The biotech start-up's ingestible chips are activated by stomach acid and send information to a small patch worn on the patient's skin, which can transmit data to a smartphone or send it over the Internet to a doctor.

Mundel said the initial project was focused on ensuring that patients took drugs at the right time and got the dose they needed -- a key issue for people after kidney and other transplant operations, when treatment frequently needs adjustment.

Longer-term, he hopes to expand the "smart pill" concept to other types of medicine and use the wealth of biometric information the Proteus chip can collect, from heart rate and temperature to body movement, to check that drugs are working properly.

Because the tiny chips are added to existing drugs, Novartis does not expect to have to conduct full-scale clinical trials to prove the new products work. Instead, it aims to do so-called bioequivalence tests to show they are the same as the original.

A bigger issue may be what checks should be put in place to protect patients' personal medical data as it is transmitted from inside their bodies by wireless and Bluetooth.

"The regulators all like the concept and have been very encouraging. But ... they want to understand how we are going to solve the data privacy issues," Mundel said.

A technology that ensures a patient takes his or her medicine and checks that it is working properly should deliver better outcomes and justify a higher price tag.

(Reporting by Ben Hirschler. Editing by Robert MacMillan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (63)
OWNER wrote:
yeah, this isn’t big brother, is it? george orwell was way ahead of his time.

how about we all have chips implanted in us so corrupt politicians and tyrants can track us, when we sleep, use the toilet, go to the store, etc., wouldn’t that be wonderful? imagine how “safe” we’d all be, that would be their argument for it.

combine that with a “carbon card” that deducts allowed “carbon use” for buying meat, driving, etc. and when you use up your credits, you can’t buy any more meat or gasoline. that’s actually underway in communist australia now.

time for the world to say “no” to this microchip tracking insanity, through revolution if necessary. human beings are not property for governments to track.

Nov 08, 2010 8:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
chrisweidner wrote:
This is all part of the Totalitarian tiptoe to microchip people. When this happens more and more often in ever greater areas of our lives, there comes a point where each person reaches the stage of unquestioning, unthinking, acquiesnence. Unthinking acquienscence where the comforty = comfort! You’re so comfortable and passive you go with the flow. The idea is to include all sources of surveillance and control… medical records etc. including every aspect of that persons life and views to be linked to a central computer so that person can be revealed on a single screen.

Nov 08, 2010 9:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Reasonsjester wrote:
Without a philosophical revolution that convinces intellectuals that ordered liberty is superior to boots-on-your-throat tyranny, I shudder to imagine the world in fifty years.

Nov 08, 2010 9:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.