Sponsored Links

Republican Issa would reject 2-yr tax-cut compromise

WASHINGTON | Mon Nov 8, 2010 7:58am EST

WASHINGTON Nov 8 (Reuters) - Republican Congressman Darrell Issa said on Monday that he cannot accept a potential compromise that would extend tax cuts for the wealthy for 2 years while making them permanent for everyone else.

"No I can't," Issa said on ABC's "Good Morning America" program when asked if he could accept that proposal. "Tax certainty is important and it's important for the investing class probably more than anybody else."

He said small businesses that would be affected by the two-year extension needed to make longer-term decisions than just two years to create jobs.

"So if anything, this is wrong-minded," Issa said. "In some ways you should say, look if you invest today we'll let you get a better deal three, four, five years from now because that's how you create jobs. Hopefully we'll come to a compromise that does allow people to make decisions beyond just this tax year."

President Barack Obama told CBS's "60 Minutes" program on Sunday that the tax-cut extension proposal was a "basis for conversation" and that he sees a potential for compromise heading into negotiations.

The battle over tax cuts is the first major legislative challenge facing Obama and Congress since last week's elections put Republicans in control of the House of Representatives starting next year.

(Reporting by Tabassum Zakaria; Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
tnazar wrote:
Well, I guess that’s it, then. It’s sad the rest of the world just doesn’t understand that Issa is actually the one in charge of everything.

Nov 08, 2010 9:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
NYTony wrote:
Just goes to show that the Republicans really aren’t interested in finding a middle of the road. Seems to me that this is a decent compromise as it does not eliminate making the tax cuts permanent for the wealthy two years from now – especially if Obama does not win the re-election, but at the same time does give them a break for the next two years.

Instead they would rather posture and make the middle class suffer when the tax breaks expire. It’s things like this that make me ashamed that my voter registration card says Republican on it.

Compromise means that both parties give up something in order to reach the middle. I wanted a split congress (and voted as such) so that some compromises would be made. If my taxes go up because of this posturing and lack of willingness to compromise on the Republican side . . in two years I’ll be crossing party lines and voting for the democrats.

Nov 08, 2010 10:16am EST  --  Report as abuse
justiceserved wrote:
Make Rep. vote over and over again for tax cuts up to and including first 250k. After each vote hammer the media with how they’re working for wealthy, not the middle class. If the Dems keep up this approach the Rep. toadies of big business will not be able to get jobs as dog catchers!

Nov 08, 2010 10:16am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.