No charges for CIA tape destruction: Justice Dept

WASHINGTON Tue Nov 9, 2010 5:16pm EST

The logo of the CIA in the lobby of the headquarters in Langley, in a file photo. REUTERS/Jason Reed

The logo of the CIA in the lobby of the headquarters in Langley, in a file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - No CIA personnel will face criminal charges for destroying videotapes of harsh interrogations of terrorism suspects, the U.S. Justice Department said on Tuesday.

While the decision will spare the CIA and the Obama administration the potential backlash and embarrassment that a trial could have generated, another federal probe continues into possible abuse of detainees by CIA personnel.

The videotapes probe was launched in January 2008 by then-U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey after revelations that the CIA in 2005 had destroyed hundreds of hours of videotapes of the interrogations of terrorism suspects Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

Zubaydah was one of three terrorism suspects who was subjected to waterboarding, a procedure in which the person experiences simulated drowning. It was believed that the tapes included footage of the waterboarding.

Human rights groups and some lawmakers call waterboarding torture, but former President George W. Bush strongly defended its use in his new memoir released on Tuesday.

Federal prosecutor John Durham conducted an "exhaustive investigation" into the destruction of the videotapes, Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller said in a statement.

"As a result of that investigation, Mr. Durham has concluded that he will not pursue criminal charges for the destruction of the interrogation videotapes," he said.

He declined to comment on the possibility of other charges such as perjury or false statements.

A CIA spokesman was not immediately available for comment.

The interrogations took place in 2002 and the CIA said that it acted lawfully in destroying the tapes because it needed to guard against leaks that could endanger interrogators. Critics accused the agency of covering up illegal acts.

Lawmakers had questioned whether the destruction flouted court orders and investigators' demands that the CIA hand over evidence in various terrorism cases.

A lawyer for the former head of the CIA's clandestine branch, Jose Rodriguez, who is believed to have made the decision about the tapes, said they were pleased that no charges would be filed for the destruction.

"This is the right decision because of the facts and the law," lawyer Robert Bennett said in a statement. He declined to comment on the possibility of other charges.

In addition to probing the destruction of the tapes, the Obama administration drew criticism last year when Attorney General Eric Holder tasked Durham to examine whether CIA employees or contractors broke the law when they conducted harsh interrogations that went beyond approved limits.

That review, which is still ongoing, came after the Justice Department's inspector general recommended considering prosecution in such instances. Holder's decision reversed a conclusion by the previous Bush administration which decided against prosecutions.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (13)
PPlainTTruth wrote:
No Surprise.

Abuse will continue.

When exposed, they will dump it on a scapegoat— an Asian American other minority law professor, or mid-level staff. No pardon if it’s a minority.

Yes, pardon if the fall guy is white.

Nov 09, 2010 2:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Janeallen wrote:
The selective prosecuting of minority fall guys for the scandal, and egregious cover-up of CIA agents’ culpability is MORE scandalous than the waterboarding interrogation techniques themselves.

Nov 09, 2010 2:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mattiacci wrote:
Seeing as how no one has been prosecuted for the acts believed to be shown on the destroyed tapes, it’s only natural that the destruction of the tapes themselves would result in no prosecutions.

Nov 09, 2010 5:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.