U.S. says it will tackle discrimination, prisons

Related Topics

Prisoners at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California are seen housed in a gymnasium due to overcrowding in the California prison system in this September 14, 2009 picture. REUTERS/Mike Blake

Prisoners at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California are seen housed in a gymnasium due to overcrowding in the California prison system in this September 14, 2009 picture.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Blake

GENEVA | Tue Nov 9, 2010 11:42am EST

GENEVA (Reuters) - The United States promised on Tuesday to tackle racial discrimination and treat prisoners humanely in its jails at home and abroad, in line with recommendations by the U.N. Human Rights Council.

A U.S. delegation, responding to 228 recommendations made by other countries during a U.N. debate last Friday, said that the Obama administration was working to close its detention center for foreign terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and would not tolerate torture anywhere.

But it rejected as "political provocations" recommendations about some judicial cases handled by U.S. courts. These had been raised by ideological foes including Cuba, which called for the release of five Cuban agents convicted of spying.

"While we are humbled by the work that remains, the United States is proud of our record of accomplishments, determined to extend it, and committed to continuing this dialogue," Harold Hongju Koh, State Department legal adviser, told the council.

The Obama administration will give its formal response to the council at its March session, after U.S. agencies make a full review of the recommendations, he said.

The Geneva forum is gradually reviewing the human rights record of all 192 U.N. members over a four-year period to 2011.

The United States defended itself against criticism of its performance from friend and foe alike last Friday at the council. It joined the body last year, ending a boycott by the administration of Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush.

"NO STONE UNTURNED"

Many countries and human rights groups criticized the U.S. justice system as disproportionately jailing racial and ethnic minorities. Prison conditions are often inhumane, they said.

"We will leave no stone unturned in our efforts to eliminate racial profiling in law enforcement, to ensure that juveniles in our justice system are treated with respect and to guarantee humane treatment in detention," Koh said on Tuesday.

The United States was also committed to ensure all qualified voters could participate in elections and would enforce laws to ensure equal access to housing, credit, jobs and education.

"At a time when the U.S. has its first African-American President and Attorney General, a female Secretary of State, our first Hispanic Supreme Court justice and an Arab-American and two Asian-American cabinet members, we see visible progress in our national quest for equality and fair treatment," said Koh, an American lawyer of Korean origin.

The United States, in its armed conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq and against al Qaeda militants, abides by all applicable law, including those upholding humane treatment, detention and use of force, he said.

"The United States defends the legality under the laws of war of using detention to remove adversaries from the conflict, but does not -- and will not -- countenance torture or inhumane treatment of detainees in its custody, wherever they are held," he added.

Jamil Dakwar of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in a statement that the Justice Department should expand its criminal investigation of torture to include not just the interrogators who mistreated captives, "but the senior Bush administration officials who authorized and facilitated it."

Bush said in his memoir "Decision Points" which hit bookstores on Tuesday that he approved a tough interrogation technique known as waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning condemned by human rights activists as torture, to try to extract information from al Qaeda operatives. He strongly defended it as critical to efforts to prevent a repeat of the Sept 11, 2001 attacks.

(Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Alydia wrote:
Sure, what will it be cupcakes and lollipops? Criminals already have all the rights in the world.
We need to do like Castro did…put all of our criminals on boats and send them off to a European country. Or preferably where this ridiculous ruling came from.
I think Obama and Koh need to be locked up for high treason!

Nov 09, 2010 11:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
Alydia wrote:
Why in the world should we be concerned about the prisoners anywhere?? They committed the crimes against humanity. Why is the U.N. not talking about that. You had better bet there is an underlying issue about this article.
The U.N. wants in every ones business. It is high time to disband the U.N. although I know that will never happen. It is going, according to the Bible, just the way it is supposed to.
Too many blind sheep in the U.S.!

Nov 09, 2010 12:01pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Phydeux wrote:
I take a bit of exception to some of the assumptions made in this article. One, just because there’s a disproportionate number of a racial minority in prison does NOT necessarily indicate discrimination. More often than not it points to social issues within a racial community.

If more blacks are being imprisoned for violent crimes, perhaps its because much of black pop culture exemplifies violent behavior.

If more hispanics are being imprisoned for illegal immigration, perhaps that’s because we share a gigantic border with a predominantly hispanic nation. You wouldn’t expect many Swiss immigrants to be sneaking over that border illegally, would you?

And racial profiling, when used properly, is NOT discriminatory. Anyone who’s ever watched Criminal Minds knows that profiling follows well known trends among criminals. And even on the show they ocassionally mention the suspect as being “a white male, intelligent, works with his hands” and so on. Though on the show they’re careful ONLY to mention race when its a white male. Wouldn’t want to offend anyone.

Sometimes racial profiling is very accurate. If you’re looking for potential Al-Qaeda terrorists, its not racist to assume that you’re more likely to be looking for a swarthy Muslim man of middle-eastern descent. That’s not racist, that’s realistic and statistically probable.

The key is that you don’t let that blind you to the possiblity that your suspect is of another race. Only that the likelihood is much higher that he’s of one race or another based on the circumstances of the crime.

And if more blacks commit violent crimes, then so be it. I don’t think we should fill our jails like they’re Noah’s Ark, maintaining a color balance. You imprison the guilty regardless of race, and if the numbers look unbalanced, then maybe people should look into why that demographic produces more inmates than others.

After all, no one gets angry that asians are statistically more likely to graduate with an advanced degree in the sciences.

Nov 09, 2010 12:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.