The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

San Francisco approves limits on toys with fast-food meals

Related Topics

A hamburger is displayed in this file photo. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

A hamburger is displayed in this file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

SAN FRANCISCO | Tue Nov 9, 2010 9:34pm EST

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - San Francisco will soon be the first major U.S. city to restrict the fast-food industry's practice of giving away toys with children's meals, under a new law given final approval on Tuesday.

The city's Board of Supervisors passed the ordinance 8-3, the same veto-proof majority it received in a preliminary vote a week earlier. The new law, sparked by concerns about the growing childhood obesity, takes effect on December 1, 2011.

Like an ordinance passed earlier this year in nearby Santa Clara County, the San Francisco measure will require that restaurant kids' meals meet certain nutritional standards before they could be sold with toys.

Opponents of the law include the National Restaurant Association and McDonald's Corp , which used its now wildly popular Happy Meal to pioneer the use of free toys to market directly to children.

The San Francisco law would bar toys from being given away with kids' meals unless those meals have less than 600 calories, contain fruits and vegetables, and include beverages without excessive fat or sugar.

Backers of the ordinance say it aims to promote healthy eating habits while combating childhood obesity.

"It's time for fast-food companies to stop exploiting children in order to sell more junk food, and this measure would at least set basic nutrition standards for meals sold with toys," Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said in a statement.

Fifteen percent of American children are overweight or obese -- which puts them at risk of developing heart disease, diabetes and cancer, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In some states, the childhood obesity rate is over 30 percent.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest this summer threatened to sue McDonald's if it did not stop using Happy Meal toys to lure children into its restaurants. A lawyer for that group said it is on track to file the lawsuit in the next several weeks.

(Writing and reporting by Steve Gorman and Lisa Baertlein)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
jtdunlop wrote:
The toys aren’t free. There’s an added cost above the price of the individual items. Therefore, the law won’t apply, because it doesn’t ban bundling toys with a meal.

Nov 09, 2010 10:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
thomasAlex wrote:
Socialism at its Finest!!

Nov 09, 2010 10:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SeattleReason wrote:
@jtdunlop The law actually addresses that. If the toy is part of the package, the package has to meet the nutritional standards.

As for clowns like thomasAlex, quit being an idiot. This is no more socialist than the frequent calls from the far-right to ban video game sales to minors because the games are considered too violent, or too sexually explicit. The law doesn’t say the business can’t sell crap food to kids, nor does it force them to add healthy food to their menu.

Nov 09, 2010 10:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.