Iran's rights to nuclear non-negotiable: Ahmadinejad

TEHRAN Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:17pm EST

Iranian workers stand in front of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, about 1,200 km (746 miles) south of Tehran October 26, 2010. REUTERS/Mehr News Agency/Majid Asgaripour

Iranian workers stand in front of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, about 1,200 km (746 miles) south of Tehran October 26, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mehr News Agency/Majid Asgaripour

Related Topics

TEHRAN (Reuters) - President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Wednesday that Iran's right to nuclear capabilities was non-negotiable, ahead of proposed talks with major world powers on its controversial atomic programme.

Western diplomats have made clear they want Iran to address their concerns about Tehran' nuclear programme in talks that the United States, France, Russia, Britain, Germany and China have offered Tehran later this month.

"We have repeatedly said that our (nuclear) rights are not negotiable ... We only hold talks to resolve international problems ... to help the establishment of peace," Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech in central town of Qazvin.

EU diplomats in Brussels said they believed Ahmadinejad was not closing the door altogether on discussion of Iran's nuclear programme, but merely reiterating a longstanding position that Iran had the same rights as other countries to develop peaceful nuclear power.

In a letter dated November 9 and seen by Reuters, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, told European Union foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton that he was ready to meet on November 23 or December 5 in Turkey, a NATO member and candidate for European Union membership.

A spokesman for Ashton said she would be discussing the letter with the six world powers, who have given her a mandate to hold talks with Jalili. Talks between Iran and the major powers failed over a year ago, leading to a tightening of international sanctions against Tehran.

David Albright, head of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, said the Iranians were reluctant to enter talks that could raise pressure on the country to restrain its nuclear activities.

"I think they (Iranian leaders) have real hesitancy about having substantive nuclear discussions. They really do resist any negotiations ... that would lead to a discussion of a suspension (of nuclear enrichment) for example," Albright said.

Ahmadinejad said Iran had always been in favor of talks held on a rational and logical basis, but would not let anyone violate its basic rights.

"Iran welcomes any hand extended with honesty but would cut off any hand extended with deception," he said.

Ahmadinejad had listed conditions for any nuclear talks, including that the parties state their opinion on the reputed by unacknowledged nuclear arsenal of Israel, Tehran's arch-enemy that has refused to rule out a pre-emptive strike to stop Iran getting the bomb.

(Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl in Vienna and Luke Baker in Brussels, Writing by Parisa Hafezi, Editing by Samia Nakhoul and Noah Barkin)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (20)
mosak wrote:
Good for Iran – standing up for itself as a signatory member of the NPT acting well within its rights and with full disclosure.

I’m disgusted with my country (USA)’s repeated threats based on mere speculation with literally no facts whatsoever to back them up. The fear-mongering is utterly disgusting.

Nov 10, 2010 7:23am EST  --  Report as abuse
The_Traveler wrote:
Sure, they’ve been totally transparent about their nuclear program just like a good NPT member should be … not.

Nov 10, 2010 8:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
boreal wrote:
Israel takes literarily and lives by the old Roman maxim: “Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi”. “What’s allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the ox.”

Nov 10, 2010 8:34am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus