Abbas seeks Security Council meeting on settlements

RAMALLAH, West Bank Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:22pm EST

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sits under a picture of the Dome of the Rock during a meeting with Middle East envoy Tony Blair (not seen) in the West Bank city of Ramallah October 19, 2010. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sits under a picture of the Dome of the Rock during a meeting with Middle East envoy Tony Blair (not seen) in the West Bank city of Ramallah October 19, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mohamad Torokman

Related Video

Video

Clinton chides Israel

Wed, Nov 10 2010

Related Topics

RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has asked for a U.N. Security Council meeting to discuss Jewish settlement building on occupied land in the West Bank where the Palestinians aim to found a state.

Israel said on Monday it would go ahead with plans for 1,300 new apartments on land in and around Jerusalem that was annexed by Israel following the 1967 Middle East war. A further 800 housing units were planned for the settlement of Ariel in the northern West Bank.

"Something must be done on the international level to halt the settlement expansion which the Israeli government is undertaking in the West Bank, including Jerusalem," Nabil Abu Rdainah, the spokesman for Abbas, said on Wednesday.

Abbas had instructed his delegate to the United Nations, where the Palestinians have observer status, to request the meeting, he told Reuters.

U.S.-backed peace talks aimed at ending the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through the creation of a Palestinian state are stalled because of the dispute over the construction of settlements.

The Palestinian delegate, Riyad Mansour, told Reuters by phone from New York that he would make the request via Arab states that have full member status.

At the United Nations, diplomats said Mansour had spoken by telephone on Wednesday with British Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant, who currently holds the council presidency, about a possible meeting but had not mentioned a specific date.

Abbas, who opposes violence in pursuit of Palestinian statehood, has said direct negotiations with Israel remain his first choice for pursuing peace.

He has also said he will seek U.S. and U.N. Security Council support for the establishment of a Palestinian state in the event of a failure of the talks, part of the "peace process" that began two decades ago.

'NOT HELPFUL'

Major powers see the settlements as an obstacle to a peace deal that would end the six-decade-old conflict.

Close to 500,000 Jews live on lands captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, where the Palestinians seek to found a state that would also include the separate Gaza Strip.

The Palestinians, concerned that settlement building will render that goal impossible, say they will not resume the peace talks until Israel agrees to halt all settlement construction.

Peace talks started in early September but were derailed a few weeks later when Israel lifted West Bank settlement construction restrictions it had been enforcing for 10 months.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Cabinet is dominated by parties that back the settlers, including his own Likud.

Israel says the annexation made Jerusalem its "united and indivisible capital," but the claim has not won international recognition.

U.S. President Barack Obama said on Tuesday the settlement-building plans were not helpful for peace talks, adding that neither side was making the extra effort for a breakthrough.

(Writing by Tom Perry; Editing by David Stamp and Peter Cooney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
phuyayyay wrote:
I wonder if Abbas and the Palestinians understand how much better they have it than the Palestinians in Gaza. Being under the control of the Israelis is not good, but it is better than the misery that Hamas has brought Gaza. I still think Israel should give the West Bank Palestinians local rule within the state of Israel and be done with it. Until the Palestinians show that they have the ability to rule themselves without promoting violence and killing there should be no deal. You only have to look at what happened once Israel left Gaza to understand the need to move cautiously with any Palestinian homeland.

Nov 10, 2010 10:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
Jetro wrote:
Abbas would be wise to turn to tell Obama to take a hike and turn to the UN rather than wait indefinitely for Obama to man up and demonstrate a semblance of leadership in this matter.

The US is not, and never has been, a fair or honest broker anyway due to Israeli/AIPAC control of our congress, so the quicker the matter is moved to the UN the sooner progress will be made.

For as former Israeli Chief Rabbi and current spiritual leader of the Knesset’s Shas political party Rabbi Ovadia Yosef said just last month: “Goyim (non-Jews) were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world”

Nov 10, 2010 11:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
Ed57 wrote:
But how much of Gaza’s difficulties have been due to Israel’s blockade of them? And not offering them a means of egress and ingress? Granted they continue to make violence against the Israeli’s but in their mind they are still at war and willing to fight with any means they have to regain their land. If there’s ever to be a peace Israel will probably have to take the initiative and give them a single contiguous state with an outside border…something that’s anathema to conservative Israelis.

However it certainly would help their cause if Hamas and Abbas’s group (PLO?) could get together and present a united front in future negotiations.

Nov 10, 2010 11:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.