The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Nader, allies seek suspension of GM IPO

WASHINGTON | Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:45pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury should make General Motors Co GM.UL suspend its planned initial public offering to ensure a better return for taxpayers on the government's stake in the company, safety and consumer advocates said on Thursday.

In a letter to President Barack Obama, the group led by consumer advocate Ralph Nader said the administration has a fiduciary responsibility to take a measured approach on the stock sale and leverage ownership to make strides on auto safety and fuel efficiency.

"The U.S. stake in GM obviously poses novel managerial challenges to the government. The appropriate response to those challenges, however, is not to run from the responsibility through passive ownership and premature sale at a loss to taxpayers," the letter said.

Prospects are slim that the Treasury will fully recover the $50 billion in taxpayer money extended to GM in bailout and bankruptcy financing last year.

The government is expected to take a loss on paper of up to $4.9 billion when it seeks to shed a third of its 60.8 percent equity stake in the public share offering expected for next week.

Nader and letter co-signers Joan Claybrook, former president of the Nader-founded consumer group Public Citizen; Robert Weissman, the organization's current president; and safety advocate Clarence Ditlow said the government, as majority shareholder in GM, "has the ability to direct or influence" the company on investments.

"As the U.S. reduces its share, so its capacity to influence such decisions diminishes," they said. "It invested precisely to preserve U.S. jobs and manufacturing capacity. It is now incumbent on the government to manage its investment to advance these objectives," the letter said.

For instance, the group urged the administration to "direct GM to increase dramatically its investments in electric cars and other transformational technologies."

Moreover, they decried a resumption of GM lobbying on auto safety, Wall Street reform and trade and currency issues while under government control.

"Why in the world is a majority government-owned -- that is, publicly owned -- entity permitted to lobby the U.S. Congress and executive agencies, often against your administration's legislative and policy positions?" the group asked.

Treasury officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

The Treasury plans to reduce the government's stake in GM gradually and has said it does not interfere in the company's day-to-day affairs.

(Reporting by John Crawley, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
jefft22 wrote:
Does anyone see the irony in Nader stating that the gov should take a lesser role in managing GM yet the gov should “direct” gm to invest in electric cars.

His causes have been downhill since “Unsafe at any Speed”.

Nov 11, 2010 3:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
buntyp wrote:
I see a lot more that is ironical. This New G.M. does not have to keep & or Cost, on their books, the ‘Legacy Costs’ of the Old G.M.

The Govt. has assumed that liability, in a deal with the Unions. For all intents & purposes, G.M. is being heavily subsidized by the Tax Payer.

The I.P.O. as being offered, will offer the potential investor, a Company that has shed it’s liability for all the ‘Union Member’ Retirees. Therefore the Investors will be investing in a Company, still being subsidized by the Govt.

What a show. 4 Ring Circus. I would say ’send in the clowns’, but I understand that they are Retired, with full Benefits, & many now working in the Govt.

This is like the ‘Keystone Cops’ on a night-out going to an Abbott & Costello comedy routine, while bemoaning how much Surplus does China have.

Nov 11, 2010 5:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
klompendanser wrote:
Nader must be very happy with all the programs that the government runs.
Does he really believe that our government with no, repeat no, business experience needs to “direct” GM to help his causes and that this will be successful?
Why is this loser still around?

Nov 11, 2010 6:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.