Tea Party kingmaker DeMint sees 'war in Washington'

CHARLESTON, South Carolina Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:25pm EST

Related Topics

CHARLESTON, South Carolina (Reuters) - The Tea Party movement is just the "tip of the iceberg" of political change and a looming "war in Washington," South Carolina's conservative Republican Senator Jim DeMint said on Thursday.

"Tea Party candidates were the energy behind all of the Republican victories," said DeMint, a kingmaker behind the loosely organized network of conservatives and libertarians that helped Republicans capture the U.S. House of Representatives in last week's midterm elections.

"I think what we're seeing is the tip of the iceberg of a new wave of citizen activism that I think will realign politics," DeMint told Reuters in a telephone interview.

The senator, who easily won election to a second term in the November 2 elections, has strongly backed a new crop of conservatives, such as Republican Senators-elect Rand Paul of Kentucky and Marco Rubio of Florida.

But he has also been blamed for backing less viable Senate candidates supported by the Tea Party, whose loss at the polls may have helped prevent a Republican takeover of the Senate.

He insisted the Tea Party was a pivotal force in the growing public fight over government spending, taxes and deficits -- issues that helped Republicans win the House in the biggest power shift in Congress since 1948.

"In some ways, this is a war in Washington. This is a crossroads in a lot of ways," DeMint said. "There's a lot at stake. The government is clearly out of control on spending programs."

The Tea Party movement has been promoted among other groups by FreedomWorks, a nonprofit conservative organization that helped build it from a series of public protests against Democratic President Barack Obama's spending and reform policies. Former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey heads FreedomWorks.

Republicans backed by the movement lost in some key Senate races, including Sharron Angle who failed to unseat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada.

Analysts have said Republicans would have had a stronger chance of capturing the Senate with more established candidates. But DeMint has offered no apologies.

"There's not one Republican senator who would have been elected without Tea Party support," he said.

"This is make-or-break time for Republicans in our country. We have to pull our country back from a precipice," DeMint said.

"I don't think people realize that we're borrowing money to pay back debt that is coming due. China and other countries are chiding our mishandling of our currency."

(Editing by Tom Brown and Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Soonerfan wrote:
Amazing arrogance out of DeMint to say no Republican Senator was elected without the Tea Party movement. Dr. Tom Coburn was elected by the same Oklahoma grassroots that he was elected by the last time in 2004! How about Senator McCain? The grassroots makes up the majority of the Tea Party but Demint doesn’t want to admit to that. In Oklahoma the Tea Party didn’t get any candidate elected as you cannot separate the two. Largest turnout 3,000 and he says that the Tea Party elected Coburn by saying all Republican Senators? He needs a reality check if he doesn’t think that Dr. Tom would have been reelected with or without the Tea Party and same for a lot of Senators.

Nov 12, 2010 1:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
radioeagle wrote:
Soonerfan: Sen. DeMint is a modest guy who doesn’t take credit for the Tea Party juggernaut, nor does he make exaggerated claims about it. As you yourself said, the Tea Party and the “grassroots” can’t be separated. By the way, cheers for your Dr. Tom. I’m concerned, however, that the other Senator, Jim “Earmark” Inhofe, is beginning to show more and more crankiness, the way Jim Bunning did.

Nov 13, 2010 1:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.