Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Asia and Europe giving U.S. science a run for the money

WASHINGTON | Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:21am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States still leads the world with its scientific clout, armed with highly respected universities and a big war chest of funding, but Europe and Asia are catching up, according to a Thomson Reuters report released on Friday.

The U.S. emphasis on biological and medical sciences leaves the fields of physical sciences and engineering open to the competition, the report finds.

"The United States is no longer the Colossus of Science, dominating the research landscape in its production of scientific papers, that it was 30 years ago," the report reads.

"It now shares this realm, on an increasingly equal basis, with the EU27 (the 27 European Union members) and Asia-Pacific," adds the report, available here

Thomson Reuters, parent company of Reuters, regularly reviews the state of scientific research using databases that include the Web of Science, which tracks the most influential scientific papers.

Scientists and engineers make their work public in scholarly journals, sharing ideas and making them available for others to critique, copy and try to replicate. The top research is used as the basis of other work more often.

"The current state of scientific research in the United States remains strong, with significant funding (some 2.8 percent of GDP, relatively more than key competitors), excellent academic institutions that are a magnet for the best minds worldwide, and a talented workforce that leads the globe in the quality of its collective research efforts, innovations, and results," the report reads.

But U.S. influence is waning -- not because the United States is doing less, but because other countries are doing more, Thomson's Jonathan Adams and David Pendlebury found.

LOSING INFLUENCE

"In 1981, U.S. scientists fielded nearly 40 percent of research papers in the most influential journals," they wrote.

"By 2009, that figure was down to 29 percent. During the same period, European nations increased their share of research papers from 33 percent to 36 percent, while research contributed by nations in the Asia-Pacific region increased from 13 percent to 31 percent."

China is now the second-largest producer of scientific papers, after the United States, with nearly 11 percent of the world's total, they found.

In 2008, Asian nations as a group passed the United States with $387 billion in research and development spending, compared with $384 billion in the United States and $280 billion in Europe.

Precisely half of U.S. research focuses on the biological sciences "just at the time when Asian nations are focusing on and investing substantial sums in engineering, physical sciences, and technology," the report notes.

In the United States, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and California Institute of Technology (MIT and Caltech) led in research, the report found.

Outside the United States, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences lead.

Earlier this week the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, released a report showing similar findings.

UNESCO said in 2002, almost 83 percent of research and development was carried out in developed countries but this dropped to 76 percent by 2007. It found China was leading the pack of emerging nations with 1.4 million researchers.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
finneganG wrote:
Georgie W was a great influence for the reduction in scientific research. He was more focused on spending all the reserves we had on cowboy antics. It was easier for him to wrap his mind around an unnecessary Iraqi conflict instead of attempting to understand the relevance of our scientific prowess.

Nov 12, 2010 10:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.