Israeli government seen accepting new settlement freeze

JERUSALEM Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:02pm EST

1 of 2. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem November 14, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Uriel Sinai/Pool

Related News

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will probably win narrow approval from his coalition government for a U.S. proposal to extend a freeze on West Bank settlement building, Israeli political sources said Sunday.

The Palestinians halted peace talks after Israel's 10-month partial construction moratorium expired in September. The Obama administration has offered Israel diplomatic and defense perks to renew the freeze for 90 days, giving negotiations a chance.

Netanyahu, who visited the United States last week, convened his cabinet to outline the proposal, which he said was still being drafted with the Americans. Once ready, it would be put to a vote in Israel's 15-minister security cabinet, he said.

"In any event, I insist that any proposal meet the State of Israel's security needs, both in the immediate term and vis-a-vis the threats that we will face in the coming decade," Netanyahu said in remarks broadcast by Israeli media.

The deal includes a U.S. undertaking not to request further extensions of the freeze, and to shield Israel against hostile resolutions in the United Nations. The Palestinians have mooted seeking U.N. support for a unilateral statehood declaration.

The Obama administration would also ask Congress to approve giving Israel $3 billion worth of advanced F-35 jets. These would supplement the 20 F-35s Israel already plans to buy for $2.75 billion drawn from annual grants it gets from Washington.

An Israeli political source said the security cabinet vote was expected later this week and that seven ministers -- Netanyahu among them -- were likely to back the U.S. proposal, against six who would vote against and two who would abstain.

The security cabinet includes representatives of major coalition partners, from Netanyahu's rightist Likud party to Defense Minister Ehud Barak's center-left Labor to Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's far-right Yisrael Beiteinu.

"I commend Prime Minister Netanyahu for taking, I think, a very constructive step," President Barack Obama said in reference to the deliberations under way in Israel.

"It's not easy for him to do but I think it's a signal that he is serious," he told reporters in Washington.

PALESTINIAN ANGER

In private, Palestinian officials have expressed anger over U.S. incentives to get Israel to prolong the partial moratorium on Jewish settlement building, saying it effectively constituted bribing Israel to fulfil basic international obligations.

A spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said there had been no formal word regarding a renewed freeze on housing starts in the West Bank, which, along with adjacent East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, Israel occupied in a 1967 war.

"An official Palestinian commitment will come only after President Abbas hears officially from the American administration what is going on between them and the Israelis," spokesman Nabil Abu Rdainah told Reuters.

Netanyahu has previously said any settlement moratorium would not apply to areas around East Jerusalem, which Israel calls part of its capital -- a status not recognized abroad -- and where Palestinians want to base their own capital.

The Palestinians said the original moratorium was too limited in scope, as it did not include public buildings or settler projects already under way. They have also demanded that any new freeze include Jewish districts in East Jerusalem.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shared the U.S. proposal at a meeting in New York last week, Netanyahu said.

Israeli officials said Netanyahu, who faces a tough political sell within his own coalition on the settlement issue, had pushed Clinton for the broad understandings.

Settler leaders, who said acceptance of the proposal would represent "a fundamental collapse" of the government's integrity, called an emergency meeting to discuss the issue.

Should Yisrael Beiteinu or a smaller pro-settler party in the coalition quit the government in protest at a renewed freeze, it could prompt Netanyahu to seek a new alliance with the centrist Kadima party of opposition leader Tzipi Livni.

(Additional reporting by Ari Rabinovitch in Jerusalem and Alister Bull in Washington; Editing by Jon Boyle)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
sunshinelv wrote:
If the terms in this article are accurate, it sounds like a good deal for Israel. No sense in cutting off your nose to spite your face. Also, if it will end Obama’s ridiculous demand to put a halt to end settlement expansion, which started this whole line of debate to begin with, I’d say it is a win, win agreement. I hope the Israeli cabinet members pass this.

Nov 14, 2010 2:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
USAalltheway wrote:
The palestinians can suck on a lemon if they don’t like it. Abbas has dragged his feet on negotiations for too long. This is a good deal for everyone.

Nov 14, 2010 2:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
todonada wrote:
I think Netanyahu and the US should just work out the entire peace deal between themselves (since they both seem to believe they don’t need the UN or indeed care what the International Community thinks).

After they have done that, the Palestinians will be able to reject it with a clear conscience.

This would be much better than agreeing to give away the store before negotiations even begin. Better for the US that they not be tied to this sort of commitment to an increasingly doubtful ally.

One day, Israel will pay. Pity the Palestinians who will have to suffer in the meantime.

Nov 14, 2010 2:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus