Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Gates sees Iran rift, says strike would unite country

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:10am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Sanctions against Iran are biting hard and triggering divisions among its leadership, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Tuesday, as he argued against a military strike over Tehran's nuclear program.

Iran has agreed to meet with a representative of the six big powers for the first time in more than a year over its uranium enrichment drive, but diplomats and analysts see little chance of a breakthrough in the long-running dispute.

Gates said he saw little choice, however, to pursuing a political strategy that includes sanctions and renewed his concerns that a military strike would only delay Iranian nuclear capabilities by two or three years.

He added that sanctions "have really bitten much harder than (Iranian leadership) anticipated," and suggested Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was increasingly at odds with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"We even have some evidence that Khamenei, now, (is) beginning to wonder if Ahmadinejad is lying to him about the impact of the sanctions on the economy. And whether he's getting the straight scoop in terms of how much trouble the economy really is in," Gates told the Wall Street Journal CEO Council in Washington.

The West believes that Iran aims to use its uranium enrichment program to build atomic weapons, which Iran denies. Both Israel and the United States have said all options remain on the table to deal with its nuclear ambitions.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ratcheted up rhetoric last week by calling on the West to convince Iran that it would be willing to take military action to prevent Tehran from producing nuclear weapons. He said economic sanctions had so far failed to do the job.

Gates has publicly disagreed with Netanyahu about the need to put forward a military threat.

Although he acknowledged on Tuesday that Iranian leaders "are still intent on acquiring nuclear weapons," he said military action was not a long-term answer.

"A military solution, as far as I'm concerned ... it will bring together a divided nation. It will make them absolutely committed to obtaining nuclear weapons. And they will just go deeper and more covert," Gates said.

"The only long-term solution in avoiding an Iranian nuclear weapons capability is for the Iranians to decide it's not in their interest. Everything else is a short-term solution."

(Editing by Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (39)
SubjectofUSSA wrote:
As if they aren’t already trying to get nuclear weapons? I lose more and more respect for Gates the longer he’s in that job.

Nov 16, 2010 10:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
macthetongue wrote:
Yea yea yea.
We can’t kill Osama, we can’t bomb a mosque, we cant disable Irans nuke program.
Short sighted idiots running this country the last 50 years. Bury your head in the sand and let your kids worry about it.
Thats OK. When Iran gives some of its stock to a group of men who bring it here to the USA and blow up a dirty bomb, that too will unite the people of Iran.
When will these idiots learn?

Nov 16, 2010 10:50am EST  --  Report as abuse
wheres_darwin wrote:
Misguided political pawn of the current administration. When there was room for a real ‘crisis’ and a political solution, the talkers didn’t even support the Iranians and instead sold them out during the student uprising. That is why if America demolished the Iranian heads and it’s military capabilities, we’d be done. More so, if you really believed in sanctions, you’d put everything into that to really avoid conflict. Instead, we have the policies of unintended consequences alive and well! Thanks

Nov 16, 2010 10:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.