Advisers recommend Human Genome lupus drug

Related Topics

Roberto Santa Cruz, 25, (R) is shown at his home in East Los Angeles as his nephew Nicolas Santa Cruz stands on Nicolas' father's World Heavyweight Championship boxing title belt, January 18, 2008. Santa Cruz has lupus and does not have health insurance, but is assisted by the Camino De Salud program. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

Roberto Santa Cruz, 25, (R) is shown at his home in East Los Angeles as his nephew Nicolas Santa Cruz stands on Nicolas' father's World Heavyweight Championship boxing title belt, January 18, 2008. Santa Cruz has lupus and does not have health insurance, but is assisted by the Camino De Salud program.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

ADELPHI, Maryland | Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:19pm EST

ADELPHI, Maryland (Reuters) - The first new lupus treatment in half a century moved closer to U.S. approval on Tuesday as an advisory panel endorsed a potential blockbuster medicine from Human Genome Sciences Inc.

Benlysta could offer a new option for patients with lupus, a debilitating and potentially fatal autoimmune disease that has proved difficult to treat. Annual global sales are forecast at $2.2 billion by 2014, according to Thomson Reuters.

That would transform unprofitable biotech Human Genome into an industry star.

Benlysta profits will be split with British partner GlaxoSmithKline Plc. Shares of both companies rose in after-hours trading following the positive ruling from the Food and Drug Administration advisers.

The FDA panel voted 13-2 to recommend approval of Benlysta. Supporters said the medicine helped ease symptoms with acceptable risks for a disease with limited options.

"The efficacy is mild, but I think there is a need for a drug even with mild efficacy," said panel member Dr. Lenore Buckley, a professor of internal medicine and pediatrics at Virginia Commonwealth University.

The FDA usually follows panel recommendations when deciding whether to approve new medicines. A final FDA ruling is due by December 9.

"It was a huge victory for the company (Human Genome)," said ISI Group analyst Mark Schoenebaum. "I think the biotech community has another blockbuster drug on its hands."

Trading in shares of Rockville, Md.-based Human Genome had been halted while the advisory panel met on Tuesday. When trading resumed after hours, its shares rose 9.7 percent to $28.40 from Monday's $25.88 close. Glaxo's U.S. shares climbed 2.9 percent to $39.65 in extended trading from Tuesday's regular close at $38.54.

INVESTORS ONCE DESPAIRED

Human Genome shares have soared with hopes for Benlysta. Investors had largely written off the drug after mixed data from an earlier trial. Shares fell below 50 cents a share in March 2009 but jumped later that year after the first encouraging Benlysta data was released.

(For a graphic on how prospects for Benlysta have affected Human Genome shares, click on r.reuters.com/sed35q )

Geoffrey Porges, an analyst with Sanford Bernstein, said the drug's approval was highly likely, although it may not come by December 9 as the companies will need to negotiate label instructions and post-approval studies with the FDA.

"You'll be left with a product with some restrictions on who it will be used for. That will be a hook for the payors to impose some restriction," Porges said. He sees the drug reaching the market by the end of the first quarter of 2011 and forecasts U.S. revenue of $2 billion by 2015.

Benlysta, known generically as belimumab, is given once a month by intravenous infusion. Analysts expect the drug will cost a patient between $15,000 and $30,000 annually, a price in line with biotech medicines for other autoimmune diseases.

Current treatment typically includes immunosuppressant drugs such as Roche's CellCept and steroids such as prednisone. Hopes for effective and safer alternatives were dashed in recent years when several companies failed in attempts to develop new treatments.

Lupus causes the immune system to attack the body's own tissue and organs. It can lead to arthritis, kidney damage, chest pain, fatigue, skin rash and other problems. Organ damage can be fatal.

An estimated 5 million people worldwide have the disease, and many cannot find relief with current drugs or suffer harsh side effects such as severe bone loss from steroids.

Patients, family members and other advocates pleaded with the panel to back Benlysta. Many spoke through tears as they described how the disease caused crushing fatigue, joint pain, and other symptoms.

TEARFUL PATIENTS

Forty-six-year-old Donna Flenory said lupus forced her to give up her career as an occupational therapist. High doses of steroids helped for a time but repeated flare-ups sent her to the hospital every year, usually in the autumn.

After joining a study of Benlysta, "when fall rolled around I was no longer sick. I had a life again," she told the panel, adding "please realize we as patients need something."

FDA reviewers, however, suggested Benlysta might have only a modest effect on lupus symptoms and might raise the risk of death, infection, or psychiatric problems including suicide. Two patients treated with Benlysta during clinical trials killed themselves and there were no suicides with a placebo.

Panel members said there were too few suicides and other deaths to conclude Benlysta was the cause but urged monitoring of side effects if the drug reached the market.

The drug's safety "looks remarkably good compared to a lot of other drugs we're using," said panel member R. John Looney, a rheumatologist at the University of Rochester.

Benlysta is designed to inhibit BLyS, a protein in the body that exists to keep B-cells functioning normally. B-cells make antibodies that prevent infection. In lupus patients, B-cells are overstimulated and make antibodies that attack the body.

Human Genome Chief Executive Thomas Watkins, speaking to reporters after the panel meeting, said the company was pleased with the ruling. "We will look forward to working with the FDA as they complete their work," he said.

An application for approval also is pending in Europe, he said.

(Additional reporting by Bill Berkrot in New York and Karey Wutkowski and Esha Dey in Washington; Editing by Maureen Bavdek, Lisa Von Ahn and Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
BobbiS wrote:
As a person with lupus, I would like to say that any new drug for this illness is welcome. It is time! For anyone who has to rely on prescription medication for their survival, perhaps each dime spent out of pocket should go toward investing in the companies! Unfortunately, most of us rely on social security disability and other government programs which only adds to the suffering… forget the physical pain. And the 2 suicides mentioned above, it is unclear why they occured. But anyone who suffers from this illness will tell you that suicide becomes a viable option. I have suffered for over a year with intense pain from the neck down and no prescription could ease the pain. It is understandable that doctor assisted euthenasia is legal, humane, and a healthy option when all else fails. But here’s to Benlysta. I hope it can end some of the suffering for those of us who truly understand what it is like to live with lupus knowing there is no cure and hoping that more attention will be given to research. I think there is hope for us yet?

Nov 17, 2010 11:50am EST  --  Report as abuse
ilaboo wrote:
keep in mind that we through paid a lot for the research done on the human genome and we as a people should not have to pay so much for this–as a retired medical professional i am well aware of the costs of research but we have paid a lot of the burden–just as we did the internet

Nov 17, 2010 2:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Regarding the cost per year for 12 IV infusions: it’s ridiculous! I also am disabled, although (thank God) not due to lupus. My condition also involves instense chronic pain, and if one is disabled, gainful employment is impossible, & therefore, no private health insurance is affordable. Overall, there’s something wrong with a system that charges US citizens for both the cost+ profit+ research fees for the drug itself, and then sells the same drug in other countries strictly on profit over the actual costs to produce the drug. Not much said about that problem in Obamacare.

Nov 18, 2010 12:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.