U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.S. comfortable with GM IPO pricing, investors

WASHINGTON | Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:31pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government is satisfied with pricing and the investor lineup in the General Motors Co public offering, a senior Obama administration official said.

Ron Bloom, the administration's point man on auto restructuring, told Reuters Insider ahead of GM trading on Thursday that the government wants a fair return for taxpayers on its $50 billion investment, but also wants to "get out of this thing as soon as we can."

Treasury is reducing its stake in GM through the initial share sale from 61 percent to 37 percent at minimum. It could sell more shares initially to bring down taxpayer exposure to 33 percent, depending on whether an overallotment option is exercised.

Bloom said GM has done the right thing and pricing of $33 per share is a "fair deal" even though the partial sale represents a loss of roughly $9 billion on taxpayers' original investment.

"We're very comfortable with the way this went," Bloom said.

Treasury is bound by an agreement preventing new sales of its stock for six months, Bloom said.

(Reporting by John Crawley, editing by Matthew Lewis)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
engineerwill wrote:
OK, I’m a taxpayer- where exactly do I go to receive my return on my investment? This is such a scam: The government uses taxpayer money to buy GM, but then keeps the money when they sell. I don’t see them returning any of it to the investors (taxppayer), so any talk about “the government wants a fair return for taxpayers on its $50 billion investment” is pure BS

Nov 18, 2010 9:07am EST  --  Report as abuse
hapasan wrote:
Where exactly do you go to receive your return on my investment?

It’s not about you. Don’t act like you dug in your pocket and picked up this check. Your share of this expenditure was like a fraction of a cent, and the money back goes directly into reducing the deficit, which helps toward reducing the tax burden on the people of this country. I can’t believe people are complaining about this at all. This is good news. Curmudgeons..

Nov 18, 2010 11:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
mis4269 wrote:
The Obama admin used taxpayer money to bail out a company that had been run into the ground by unions. They kept asking for more and more not concerned about the viability of the company. Most Americans believe they should have reaped what they had sown.

Nov 18, 2010 1:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.