Wealth and Investing Center

U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Lawmakers hit banks, regulators on foreclosures

1 of 2. A vacant building for lease is pictured in upper Manhattan, New York, October 26, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

WASHINGTON | Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:50pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers hauled the top U.S. mortgage lenders and their regulators to Capitol Hill on Thursday to chastise them for widespread flaws in foreclosure documents, but failed to extract any promises of fines or fresh loan modification programs.

Major banks admitted sloppy documentation to a House of Representatives' subcommittee but said they had taken steps to tighten procedures and that the basis of their foreclosures has been accurate.

Federal regulators said they learned of the problems from news reports but are now actively reviewing banks' work and plan to issue their findings in January.

It was the second congressional hearing this week into revelations that lenders used "robo-signers" to sign hundreds of foreclosure documents a day, without proper legal reviews.

Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services housing subcommittee, repeatedly questioned whether regulators had gone far enough in their penalties and oversight. "Why should take you seriously?" she asked.

Lawmakers threw most of their best jabs at regulators, who testified first, while a panel with bank executives, who were sworn in as witnesses by Waters, was sparsely attended.

Officials from the Federal Reserve and other bank regulators were followed by executives from Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Ally Financial.

The U.S. housing industry remains in a multi-year slump that followed years of easy lending; a collapse that precipitated the recent financial crisis and the worst economic downturn since the 1930s.

Banks have now repossessed just over three million homes through October since January of 2007, according to real estate data firm RealtyTrac.

MULTIPLE PROBES

Mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices are being investigated by both federal officials and all 50 state attorneys general.

John Walsh, acting comptroller of the currency, said the problems were isolated at specific institutions, rather than a widespread industry issue. "I am not aware of a reason to believe there is a systemic failing of the system," he said.

The paperwork fiasco has reignited public anger with banks that received billions of dollars in taxpayer aid during the financial crisis.

Walsh said examiners were focused on monitoring banks' mortgage modification programs, rather than keeping a close watch on how they processed foreclosures.

Banking regulators warned in written testimony that banks could face fines or criminal referrals and urged institutions to maintain a capital cushion to cover any losses from the mortgage documentation problems.

Some industry experts think banks face a greater financial risk from investors demanding they repurchase mortgage-backed securities, charging they misrepresented the underlying loans, an issue often referred to as "putback risk."

In a letter released on Thursday, a group of House Democrats asked the new Financial Stability Oversight Committee to consider whether some financial companies should be required to divest affiliates that service securitized mortgages.

Fed Governor Elizabeth Duke told the house hearing that upcoming stress tests of the 19 largest U.S. banks would include estimates of the putback liability.

In their testimony, the bankers stressed their firms do everything possible to avoid foreclosure, and that troubled borrowers are not rushed out of their homes.

Wells Fargo said evicted homeowners were, on average, 16 payments behind on their loans. Bank of America and JPMorgan cited similar figures.

DAMP HAMP

Lawmakers offered sharp criticism of the Obama administration's main program to help prevent foreclosures.

"I think it's safe to say HAMP is not meeting its goal of preventing foreclosures," Waters said, referring to the $50 billion Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) allocated from the $700 billion bank rescue package.

The number of borrowers helped by HAMP continued to dwindle, the Treasury Department said later on Thursday in releasing its October update on the program.

Phyllis Caldwell, who runs Treasury's Homeownership Preservation Office, defended HAMP at the hearing, saying it had transformed the operations of mortgage servicers, industry-speak for payment collectors.

Bank of America says it is ramping up modifications, but becoming more reliant on its own programs.

Both lawmakers and witnesses described a mortgage servicing and foreclosure process that is complicated, frustrating and difficult for borrowers to understand.

"We have processes not built for the current environment. It's been three years, we need to change the process," said Thomas Marano, head of mortgage operations at Ally Financial.

There was little agreement at the hearing, however, about what changes should be made.

Fresh data released on Thursday showed the U.S. housing recovery is still uneven.

The mortgage delinquency rate declined last quarter amid hints of improvement in the job market, but that bit of good news was countered by headwinds from defaults and rising foreclosure starts, the Mortgage Bankers Association said.

Top bank executives have said this week they want a settlement soon of the states' probe but the attorneys general have said a deal could be months away.

Any settlement is likely to require banks to make greater efforts to keep borrowers in their homes.

Duke told the hearing she would support some sort of mechanism like a nationwide fund for homeowners wrongly foreclosed upon -- an idea being considered by the state attorneys general.

"I think would be very positive if there was a mechanism to deal with these problems as they arise," Duke said.

(Reporting by Dave Clarke and Corbett B. Daly in Washington, Dan Levine in San Francisco, Joe Rauch in Charlotte; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
PetePleterson wrote:
So far the topic of “robo-signers” hasn’t mentioned those that were home owners.

At closing in 2006 my paperwork was at least an inch thick and had not just duplicates, but many triples of the same document that had to be signed individually.

Knowing the scrutiny I was inclined to give each page (”Enough; already!”), I’m not surprised that the clerical personnel rubber-stamping a stack of foreclosures on a daily basis had little interest in the fine print.

Nov 18, 2010 2:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
I agree with risenstar and Maxine Waters but why the continual whitewash of facts by T-R? They are a news agency charged with reporting the news not editing the facts. Tens of thousands of docs were illegally authorized by bank servicing companies(the art. stated hundreds!)Falsifying legal docs & signing sworn affidavits is a crime not “improper legal review.” Walsh’s statement is cute. “The problems were isolated at specific institutions rather then a wide spread industry wide issue.” Those specific insts are the 4 major banks that control 75% of all mortgages in the US. That is by definition a systemic failure. A 1000% increase in foreclosures in the last two years over historic rates in the last 20 years is a systemic failure-period.
A leading Rep.is quoted as “being pleased with the steps banks have taken to deal with the “paper work problems.” A jammed copy machine is a paper work problem, 100s of thousands of forged-yes-forged, fraudulent and falsified legal documents by the entire lending industry is criminal conduct that warrents filing RICO charges. I have personal knowledge that a large NY law firm prosecuting 1000s of foreclosures knowingly forged documents and falsified affidavits which at minimum is perjury. On a nation wide scale it’s racketeering and influencing financial markets for personal gain, corruption by concerted effort i.e. an organized crime syndicate. As Justice Stevens stated in his dissenting opinion in Bush v. Gore decision. I’m paraphrasing …when the American people can no longer rely upon an unbiased judiciary to decide cases brought before them the rule of law breaks down and the authority of the entire institution falls into doubt and the very rule of law must be questioned. If the American people are dumb enough to fall for this criminal cover up our once great nation is finished. This is not what Democracy look like.

Nov 18, 2010 3:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DaBear wrote:
Banks are not in business to foreclose on houses. They are in business to make loans and use the interest on those loans to pay for the lights and the salaries of their employees. When thousands of people decide to just stop paying on their loans, then don’t be surprised if the bankers stumble a bit when they are suddenly thrust into the role of becoming lawyers and realtors in an effort to recoup 20 cents on the dollar from these loans gone bad. If the banks are now forced to spend money on high-priced lawyers and extra court delays just to get the devalued property back, don’t be surprised when they refuse to make new home loans.

Nov 18, 2010 3:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.