U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Pentagon says 2014 Afghan deadline "aspirational"

Related Topics

Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai arrives in Lisbon for the forthcoming NATO Summit November 18, 2010. REUTERS/Pool

Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai arrives in Lisbon for the forthcoming NATO Summit November 18, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Pool

WASHINGTON | Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:35pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Hamid Karzai's target to take the lead from NATO in securing Afghanistan by the end of 2014 is only "aspirational" and may not be possible everywhere in the country, the Pentagon said on Thursday.

The 2014 target is expected to be a top agenda item at a NATO summit in Lisbon this week, where world leaders including President Barack Obama will lay the plans for their troops' eventual exit from the unpopular war.

Karzai has said he wants the Afghan army and police to take control of the country by 2014, a target Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have called realistic.

"I would emphasize two things here: Number one, it is the end of 2014, so effectively, it's by 2015," Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters.

"Although the hope is, the goal is, to have Afghan security forces in the lead over the preponderance of the country by then, it does not necessarily mean that ... everywhere in the country they will necessarily be in the lead," he added.

Mark Sedwill, the top NATO civilian representative in Afghanistan, said earlier this week that the transition process may run into 2015 and beyond, and that after foreign troops step down from combat roles the country could see "eye-watering levels of violence".

Analysts have interpreted the NATO comments as an attempt to soften the timeline while sticking to a more appealing message that U.S. and NATO forces are preparing for an eventual exit after more than nine years of war.

Violence in Afghanistan is at its worst since the Taliban were overthrown in late 2001, with record casualties on all sides of the conflict, and the insurgency spreading to previously peaceful northern and western parts of the country.

The Taliban, who some analysts say may be heartened by a deadline for the departure of foreign troops, have said they aim to continue to step up their military campaigns.

"Basically we have no expectation that (foreign troops) will leave without any pressure," Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told Reuters by phone from an undisclosed location.

"They should learn from our history, but it seems they do not. Whatever strategy or timetable they adopt, it will not have an impact on our pressure."

Karzai, already embroiled in a dispute with NATO's commander about a recent criticism of the visibility and intensity of foreign forces' operations, declined direct comment on Sedwill's recent remarks.

His spokesman said that the president expected the summit to focus on transition, and would underline the need for Afghan forces to play a more high-profile role in operations.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart in Washington and Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
dbtkgrace wrote:
After years of spending Billions of dollars we don’t have and sending young kids to their early grave, are we more safe in the US? Funny, I feel safer in Canada.

Nov 18, 2010 11:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
opsudrania wrote:
It is a long time before 2014 or July 2011
to guess anything. One should read these statements with the prism of the war and political strategy. Obama has had a tough time in his recent mid term polls. He has also to prepare his voters for next 2012 fight.

Afghanistan is a difficult terrain on several counts. Karzai is a most corrupt person and can not be easily relied upon. The Afghans have a long history of unreliable tribal warlords. Then he has an ambitious neighbour who will like to see Karzai as a weakling more dependent on Pak for his security and other relations to keep their nose up.

Let us see what the time has in its womb. Hence take it easy for the time being. Let the US voters read in it.
God bless
Dr. O. P. Sudrania

Nov 19, 2010 12:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
beancube2101 wrote:
Zionists want you to focus on enemies they created for you. Zionists need exploitations among populations to maintain power. Zionists hijacked NATO experiments tactics leave behind bigger messes than any achievements that they claimed. Members of any democratic society should vote them away using their democratic elections.

Nov 19, 2010 3:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.