Gates says START a centerpiece of ties with Russia

SANTA CRUZ, Bolivia Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:26pm EST

Defense Secretary Robert Gates is seen during the signing ceremony of the Adoption of Joint Declaration of the first Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers Meeting Plus at the National Convention Center in Hanoi October 12, 2010. REUTERS/Luong Thai Linh/POOL

Defense Secretary Robert Gates is seen during the signing ceremony of the Adoption of Joint Declaration of the first Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers Meeting Plus at the National Convention Center in Hanoi October 12, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Luong Thai Linh/POOL

Related Video

Related Topics

SANTA CRUZ, Bolivia (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Sunday the New START nuclear treaty was a centerpiece of improved U.S. ties with Russia and failure to ratify the accord could pose "real problems for the relationship."

"I think that there are potentially serious consequences for failure to ratify the New START agreement," Gates told reporters in Bolivia, where he was attending the Conference of Defense Ministers of the Americas.

On the key sticking point of spending to modernize U.S. nuclear forces, Gates said he did not know what more the Republicans wanted because the Obama administration had agreed to the additions they had requested.

"I don't know what they're looking for frankly because we have essentially, in terms of the adds that they thought were needed, we have made those adds," he said.

President Barack Obama is headed toward a showdown with Senate Republicans over the START treaty and has made it one of his key legislative objectives for the final weeks of the current Congress, whose term expires in early January.

Democrats fear the treaty may face even greater hurdles when the new Congress takes office because their Senate majority will be considerably smaller after the losses they suffered in the November elections. Treaties require approval by two-thirds of the 100-member Senate.

Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed the new treaty in April, committing the two former Cold War foes to reducing deployed nuclear warheads by about 30 percent, to no more than 1,550, within seven years.

Gates said Senate failure to ratify the agreement could have political consequences for the bilateral relationship, which has improved since Obama began trying to "reset" ties with Moscow after they soured during the administration of President George W. Bush.

'NOT TRYING TO SCAREMONGER'

Gates, a Republican who was Bush's defense secretary and was asked to stay on by Obama, noted the Russians had cooperated with the United States on developing the northern supply route for Afghanistan and the U.N. Security Council resolution imposing sanctions on Iran. Over the weekend, Moscow agreed to begin working with NATO on missile defenses.

"So some positive things have been happening in this relationship. If the START treaty isn't ratified, I think all of that is potentially at risk," Gates said.

"I'm not trying to scaremonger. I just think you have to be realistic that the New START treaty is a centerpiece of the relationship and for that not to be ratified, I think, poses real potential problems for the relationship."

One of the main Republican demands for supporting the treaty is ensuring funds are available to modernize U.S. nuclear weapons systems to make sure they work effectively.

The Obama administration has agreed to commit $80 billion over the next decade to upgrade U.S. nuclear weapons. In negotiations with Republicans, the administration pledged to spend an additional $4.1 billion over five years.

Gates said failure to ratify START would jeopardize those funds.

"If there is no New START agreement, I think the additional funds that the administration has asked for modernizing our nuclear enterprise are very much at risk," he said.

(Editing by Peter Cooney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Relations between the two nations have always been this strained, from the Cold War era to the present era of which we’re in. Recent events have made this fact more apparent; for example, the Russian spy ring uncovered within the United States. These spies were sent back to Russia and hailed as heroes there. It’s good to see plans of disarmament of nuclear warheads on both sides but as long as one still remains on either side, I doubt the relationship between the United States and Russia (who apparently is trying to relive its Soviet Union glory days in account of its recent actions) will better.

Nov 22, 2010 12:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
rowley wrote:
Another Russian ‘Tie Down’ of our defense.
Who wins with this? NOT USA.

Nov 22, 2010 8:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
BHOlied wrote:
@ginchin,

Right, Democrats are all great and Repuplicans are all wrong.

Sounds familiar. Lets discuss the article shall we? Great…

The simple fact is that Russia is not our friend. They are not to be trusted. They are run by the M-A-F-I-A. Get it? There is no democracy. There is no freedom, there is no prosperity appart from petro sales.

Don’t pretend that Republicans want nukes un-accounted for, what kind of stupid argument is that?

The fact is that Russia is not to be trusted and not to mention their atomic arsenal is said to be decaying.

Nov 22, 2010 1:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.