Bishop sorry for Prince William wedding slur

Related Topics

Newspapers are displayed at a news stand, in London November 17, 2010. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett

Newspapers are displayed at a news stand, in London November 17, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Suzanne Plunkett

LONDON | Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:51pm EST

LONDON (Reuters) - A Church of England bishop apologized on Monday for suggesting that the marriage of Prince William and his fiancée Kate Middleton would only last seven years and that the couple were "shallow celebrities."

Pete Broadbent, the Bishop of Willesden in northwest London, said he was sorry for his online comments about the couple, who announced their engagement last week, which were picked up and condemned by the British media over the weekend.

"I don't care about the Royals," the bishop wrote on the social networking website Facebook, saying he was a republican and that there were "more broken marriages and philanderers among these people than not."

"They cost us an arm and a leg. As with most shallow celebrities they will be set up to fail by the gutter press ... I give the marriage seven years," he added.

His views were reported on the front page on one newspaper on Saturday and Broadbent admitted he had been unwise to make the comments on an internet forum.

"I have conveyed to Prince Charles and to Prince William and Kate Middleton my sincere regrets for the distress caused by my remarks and the subsequent media attention about the forthcoming Royal Wedding," he said in a statement.

"I recognize that the tone of my language and the content of what I said were deeply offensive, and I apologize unreservedly for the hurt caused.

"I wish Prince William and Kate Middleton a happy and lifelong marriage, and will hold them in my prayers."

William and Middleton, both 28, will marry in either spring or summer 2011 and news of the wedding appears to have been well-received by most Britons, although some have questioned its cost when the country is recovering from a deep recession.

More than three-quarters of those surveyed for one opinion poll believed the wedding would be good for the monarchy while another suggested most Britons wanted William to be the next king instead of his father Prince Charles.

(Reporting by Michael Holden, editing by Paul Casciato)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
wolf91101 wrote:
why should a man apoligize for what he beleives to be true?

Nov 22, 2010 2:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
runpl wrote:
Why should a man apologize for what IS probably true?

Nov 22, 2010 8:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
k9gardner wrote:
Why should he apologize? Two reasons. First, he should apologize because EVERY marriage is, at times, held together by a mere thread. The added stress of the “gutter press” watching every twitch and heartbeat of the Royal Couple, looking for a chink in the armour, makes it that much more difficult and needful of support and prayers for a lasting bond.

Second, the man who misspoke is a Bishop in the Church of England. The Queen – Prince William’s grandmother – is the head of that Church. Has he so little respect for his seniors and so little regard for his own church’s institution of marriage that he would put his own personal politics (”I’m a republican”) above all of this? He should be removed from his office, or drawn and quartered, or some suitable form of punishment. He is not fit to occupy his office.

Nov 23, 2010 10:30am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.