A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Afghan violence soars, insurgency expanding: U.S.

A U.S. soldier from 2nd Brigade Special Troops Battalion walks during an early morning patrol in Zhari district in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, November 22, 2010. REUTERS/Peter Andrews

A U.S. soldier from 2nd Brigade Special Troops Battalion walks during an early morning patrol in Zhari district in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, November 22, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Peter Andrews

WASHINGTON | Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:19pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Violence in Afghanistan hit an all-time high in recent months as Western troops battled an increasingly sophisticated insurgency expanding across the country, the U.S. military said on Tuesday.

Nine years after the arrival of foreign forces, the Pentagon said all types of violent incidents in Afghanistan had increased from April through the end of September, up 300 percent from 2007, except for the use of roadside bombs.

The White House will reveal in coming weeks its review of the war a year after President Barack Obama unveiled a new strategy for the flagging, unpopular campaign in Afghanistan.

Even as the Pentagon's latest congressionally mandated report painted a grim picture of the situation in Afghanistan, where corruption undermines the fight against the Taliban and only halting, uneven improvements to Afghans' lives have been achieved, U.S. officials said there were signs of progress.

Increased troop levels have bolstered security in some areas in the past six weeks, a period not captured in the twice-annual report, officials said, and foreign troops have managed to push Taliban violence back from cities and towns.

"But this progress is fragile -- this is a very tough fight," a senior State Department official told reporters on condition of anonymity.

Yet some onlookers are skeptical even a far-off goal of putting Afghan forces in the lead in 2014 can be reached, as foreign forces struggle to train and fortify local police and soldiers and bring about a modicum of self-governance and growth in one of the world's poorest countries.

In its report, the Pentagon depicted a 'resilient' opponent in Afghanistan, where the Taliban enjoys a steady stream of funding at home and from other Islamic states. Insurgents have fanned out across the country.

"Despite the increase in (local and foreign forces') capabilities to counter insurgent attacks, the insurgents' tactics, techniques and procedures continue to evolve in sophistication," the report found.

U.S. QUESTIONS AFGHAN EFFORTS

The comments come a day before Afghan electoral officials were expected to reveal final results of September's parliamentary polls after complaints of fraud, another reminder of the deep-seated corruption gripping Afghanistan.

The Pentagon found that while the government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai was making some efforts to combat corruption, there was a questionable commitment to ending impunity and prosecuting corrupt officials.

Officials said certain "predatory" corruption, like that among police, encouraged Afghans to join the Taliban.

"Corruption continues to have a corrosive effect on (international) efforts in Afghanistan," the report found.

The military also said Iran continued to provide weapons and training to the Taliban and that their safe havens along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border remained an obstacle even as Pakistani military cooperation with NATO improved.

(Reporting by Missy Ryan; Editing by and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
searider wrote:
Pull all military out of Afghanistan ! There is no “end game”. There is nothing to be gained. The people do not want anyone to “save’ them. They’re happy in the ninth century and the feudal system works just fine for them. Corruption and violence are simply replacements for the TV’s and laptops they don’t have…..

Nov 23, 2010 3:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
shrimpster wrote:
searider is right on!

Not to mention that Russia must be loving this. Must be sweet revenge for them.

Nov 23, 2010 4:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jarocks wrote:
searider is right. It is time to go – but – this is a painful decision because there should be NO doubt in anyone’s mind that if we leave now the Taliban WILL resume control of Afghanistan and will resort to raping and imprisoning girls and women who are not totally subserviant. And the Taliban WILL torture and execute those who disagree with them without providing fair hearings or trials. And the Taliban WILL attack us again in the future. These things will happen, so it hurts to leave knowing pain follows us whether we stay or go…nothing but tragedy comes from humans who choose to live like uncivilized animals. The Taliban belong behind the bars of a zoo; we should pull out of Afghanistan and then isolate them there from the rest of the world.

Nov 23, 2010 4:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.