South Koreans express frustration with inaction

SEOUL | Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:43am EST

SEOUL (Reuters) - Young South Koreans, born decades after the Korean War and enjoying the peace and riches of the most wired country in the world, urged their government on Wednesday to respond strongly to North Korea's artillery attack.

South Korea is the world's 13th-largest economy, and Asia's fourth-largest, and an exporting power house. But its people feel helpless and angry -- not with North Korea, against which protests have been small and restrained, but with the government's failure to take more robust action.

First there was the attack on the Cheonan warship in March, blamed by the United States and South Korea on the North, and now this.

"Compared with the Korean War, we are no more lagging behind North Korea in military capacity," said Kang Chun-mo, 36, an office worker at a top business group near Seoul, one of several interviewed by Reuters.

"But our government looks like responding too timidly. They have been talking of 'retaliation', but looking back on the Cheonan incident in March, I feel heavy about our government's response."

The Lee administration has also been subjected to rigorous questioning by the ruling party and opposition lawmakers over its slow response to the attack.

North Korea fired dozens of artillery shells at the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong on Tuesday, killing two South Korean soldiers and setting houses ablaze in the heaviest attack on its neighbor since the Korean War ended in 1953.

South Korea warned of "massive retaliation" but was careful to avoid suggestion of any imminent action.

Tension between the two Koreas has been high for months after the sinking of the Cheonan corvette with the death of 46 sailors. North Korea has denied responsibility.

"I think it is unfair that we keep being attacked by the North, and us not doing much about it," said Min Kyung-ock, 30, a researcher with a government think tank. "I think our country has the right to retaliate and protect our people."

Kim Hyun-jeong, a 23-year-old university student, said she first learnt of the attack by Twitter.

"I think it is unfair that we keep being attacked by the North, and us not doing much about it," she said. "Previously, I was not threatened by North Korea, but after the incident, I realize the Korean War is not over. I think the government should take a tough stance on the North."

North and South Korea are still technically still at war, the 1950-53 conflict ending in a mere truce, not a peace treaty.

Yang Yeong-hwan, 82, lives in Seoul, the South Korean capital that was razed during the war and expressed helplessness.

"Our government should take more stern measures against the North. But what can we do? We have little power. China and the U.S. have the sway."

Chung Doo-sun, born in 1955 and whose daughter and three grandchildren still live on Yeonpyeong, asked why the South didn't return fire "immediately they took the covers off their artillery."

"I mean this is the age of cutting age technology and we talk about how we're looking at everything they do from satellites," he said. "We should have started returning fire the minute they cranked up their artillery. I just don't get it."

(Additional reporting by Jack Kim in Incheon and Cheon Jong-woo, Yeonhee Kim, Jungyoun Park and Kim Miyoung in Seoul; Writing by Nick Macfie)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
S_Car_Go wrote:
Sometimes the best action is no action at all. North Korea is barely surviving – with any available resources delivered to prop up the State. The North’s aggression is should be viewed as a sign of desperation. Ride it out and let them implode. Some may think that this is an opportunity to end this once and for all. perhaps; but is South Korea ready and willing to financially support the massive welfare state that the North would become in the event of a victory?

Nov 24, 2010 12:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Thorgood wrote:
It was reported that N. Korea was motivated by a lack of foreign food aid and S. Korea’s military presence in the vicinity. It seems appropriate that at US carrier is deployed to show support of S. Korea, and it seems that the foreign food aid should be delayed for at least one month for each person killed in the attack, along with guarantees of peace for the foreseeable future.

Nov 24, 2010 1:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jcvoda wrote:
South Korea must walk a difficult line.

True, the North is desperate and relies on handouts to feed its people. But to do nothing only encourages the (criminally insane) “imperial leader” to undertake even GREATER acts of aggression, in order to stay in the international spotlight (which helps to divert the attention NK citizens away from the fact that they are slowly starving to death).

Nov 24, 2010 1:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.