Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The Afghan Army
The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Holiday travel smooth despite new security
1 of 11. A TSA worker runs her palms across a traveler's chest during a patdown search at Denver International Airport, the day before the Thanksgiving holiday, November 24, 2010.
Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking
NEW YORK |
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Millions of Americans took to the skies on Wednesday for the start of the Thanksgiving holiday but air travel flowed smoothly as passengers largely ignored calls to protest more invasive security procedures.
The enhanced screening methods that have drawn complaints from some Americans and lawmakers in Congress involve revealing full-body imaging scanners and physical patdowns for travelers who opt out of the scans or raise security concerns.
By Wednesday evening -- traditionally one of the busiest U.S. travel days -- there were no reports of wide-scale protests or disruptions at major airports. The Federal Aviation Administration website also showed few weather delays.
"I'm going to ask for a (body) scan. Like that guy said, I don't want them touching my junk," said Nick Mazzanti, 36, who works in public relations in New York, referring to an Internet video that fueled protests against more invasive security.
The video captured audio of a California man telling an airport security official, "If you touch my junk, I'm going to have you arrested." Critics also waged an Internet campaign urging passengers to refuse having their bodies scanned.
But a post on a Transportation Security Administration blog, blog.tsa.gov/, said, "We're receiving reports of minimal wait times across the entire country -- from Honolulu to Myrtle Beach and everywhere in between -- and no disruptions."
Music student Emile Trisfith, 19, was traveling home to New York City from Chicago's O'Hare International Airport for Thanksgiving and said he had been prepared for the worst. "There is always a long line but today there wasn't," he said.
Thanksgiving travelers were also expected to throng Amtrak rail service and highways to reach family for the holiday.
24 MILLION AIR TRAVELERS EXPECTED
The new airport security follows attempted attacks on airliners. Last month, authorities thwarted the bombing of U.S.-bound cargo flights. Last Christmas Day, a man tried to set off a bomb in his underwear on a flight to Detroit.
The Yemen-based group al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula claimed responsibility for both plots.
Airlines expect 24 million people to fly during the Thanksgiving holiday period. Many U.S. families come together for Thanksgiving, which marks the European Pilgrim settlers' first successful harvest in 1621 shared with American Indians.
The TSA estimates that fewer than 2 percent of the 2 million passengers screened daily, or 40,000, are given the patdowns.
"I'm glad they take the extra precaution," said Stacy David, 46, at Orlando International Airport in Florida. "I feel sorry for the guy who has to look at (the body scans) all day."
But a handful of patdowns made headlines recently. The TSA apologized after a bladder cancer survivor's urostomy bag opened during a security patdown and covered him with urine.
TSA chief John Pistole told CNN on Wednesday he believed the full-body scanners and patdowns were necessary but that officials were trying to work out if there were less invasive ways of ensuring airline security.
At least half of Americans say the airport patdowns go too far, recent polls showed. Yet most support the full-body scanning machines at airports and give more priority to preventing terrorism than protecting their privacy.
(Additional reporting by Daniel Bases and Dan Trotta in New York, Eric Johnson in Chicago, Barbara Liston in Orlando and Alex Dobuzinskis in Los Angeles, Writing by Michelle Nichols; , Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Peter Cooney)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Objecting to the scans is simply a way to show the government that we think they went too far and/or don’t want to be exposed to additional radiation.
You do not have to expose a person’s genitals or breasts to strangers to improve security. The technology exists to preserve privacy, while screening.
Some of us (me) have had actual radiation treatments for serious health conditions. After having been radioactive for about a week from a thyroid treatment, I certainly am not keen on exposing myself to unnecesary radiation. Radiation exposure is cumulative. Not fair to slow down persons that opt to avoid it. The government just needs to be reasonable and understanding.







Follow Reuters