Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Sponsored Links
Tax, spending divide hampers deficit cut push
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two more proposals to cut the budget deficit emerged on Monday, underscoring a deep divide on taxes and spending that is likely to blunt the impact of a plan due in two days from a presidential panel.
The deficit and the national debt have soared in recent years.
The White House sharpened its focus on the issue on Monday, saying President Barack Obama will propose a two-year freeze on the pay of civilian federal workers.
The freeze would be more of a gesture than a substantive change, however, saving $2 billion from the current year's estimated $3.8 trillion budget.
Annual budget deficits in recent years have approached 10 percent of GDP, the highest levels seen since World War II, adding steadily to the record $13.6 trillion U.S. debt.
Assigned to come up with a comprehensive deficit strategy, a commission was set up earlier this year by Obama. It will meet on Wednesday to release and discuss a final report.
Commission members talked by telephone about their views over the Thanksgiving holiday. They had been expected to meet on Tuesday, but the commission said on Monday only one-on-one meetings between the co-chairman and members will occur then.
Little progress was seen for now on bridging a split between Democratic commission members who want to raise taxes and protect social program spending, versus Republicans opposed to tax increases and supportive of sharper spending cuts.
The Medicare and Medicaid health programs -- major drivers of long-term deficits -- are points of contention, as are defense spending, Social Security pensions, and politically sensitive tax breaks such as the mortgage interest deduction.
The chairmen of the Obama commission -- former Republican Senator Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, who was chief of staff for President Bill Clinton -- on November 10 unveiled their own set of recommendations. These, with revisions still being negotiated, were expected to form the basis of a final report to be voted on by the commission on Wednesday.
Most experts on the budget deficit agree that both tax increases and spending cuts are needed in any serious strategy to tackle the deficit and the fast-mounting national debt. But agreement on that has eluded the commission so far.
LIBERAL GROUPS UNVEIL REPORTS
A separate report issued on Monday by Our Fiscal Security, a coalition of liberal groups, called for restraining healthcare cost growth, cutting defense spending, and raising the cap on earnings subject to Social Security taxation.
It also recommended taxing capital gains and dividends as ordinary income, instead of at the present lower rate of 15 percent; capping itemized deductions; changing the charitable giving deduction to a credit, and limiting the deductibility of corporate debt interest payments for financial firms.
Our Fiscal Security includes the following groups: the Economic Policy Institute, The Century Foundation and Demos.
They additionally urged a financial speculation tax; a tax on roughly 60 major financial institutions with assets above $50 billion that benefited from 2008's Wall Street bailouts; a tax surcharge on millionaires, and a higher gasoline tax.
Another liberal group -- the Citizens' Commission on Jobs, Deficits and America's Economic Future -- put forward some similar proposals to "accelerate the economic recovery while achieving a stable and sustainable level of debt by 2015."
It said any plan to cut the deficit should be deferred until unemployment, running at 9.6 percent, drops to 5.5 percent. Otherwise, spending cuts and tax hikes could undermine the nation's fragile economic recovery, it said.
The group called for more federal aid to states, new steps to spur bank lending and expiration at year-end of tax cuts for the wealthy put in place by former President George W. Bush.
"We must remove Social Security from 'deficit cutting' exercises, increase its revenues, provide modest benefit increases, and assure the public that its $2.6 trillion trust fund assets will not be used for other purposes," it added.
(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by Jan Paschal)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
We will not be able to tackle the deficit without some increase in taxes and the wealthy are the only ones left who can afford it. After all, last quarter we saw the highest corporate profits on record, and yet Republicans when workers to keep taking it on the chin while protecting the wealth of America’s richest. It’s time to unite and a better deal in America’s economy. And while we’re at it the government should implement price freezes on prescription drugs and all healthcare-related services.
We’re not talking about returning to the tax rates during the time Eisenhower was President and people making over $300,000 a year were paying 91%. Not renewing the Bush tax cuts for the rich would only up the highest tax bracket from 35% to 39.6. If that’s socialism then the greatest country in the world has been a wonderful role model for socialism because during better times taxes were much, much higher for the rich and the majority of the country was much happier and economically comfortable. The economy was humming along like a finely tuned machine. People could also afford their healthcare without bankrupting them.
Raising personal income tax rates on the wealthiest Americans will have a negligible effect on job creation. The tax cuts have been in place for nearly 9 years and they aren’t creating jobs in America. It’s silly to suggest that all of a sudden after 9 years they’ll start creating jobs. That makes no sense.
You have no realistic understanding of how the economy works in job creation if you honestly believe that companies decide whether or not to hire based on if there’s a Democrat or Republican in the White House. That’s nonsense. The economy was very strong under Clinton (who also, I might add, raised taxes on the rich and succeeded in, not only balancing the budget, but produced a budget surplus). Did you not read that last quarter American companies recorded their highest profits since we started keeping track? If we had a Republican president you’d be waving that around saying that it was because we have a Republican in the White House. But, alas, it happened with a Democrat in the White House so you ignore the fact all together.
I hate to be the one to break this to you, but your losing your job had nothing to do with who won the presidency, so get that nonsense out of your head. It probably had more to do with your job being moved to China or India. That’s what corporate America is doing to make their record-breaking profits. Wake up and start sticking up for yourself, but do it with accurate information and not the propaganda that you’re being fed from Rush Limbaugh and FOX News.





Follow Reuters