Senate passes overhaul of food safety system

WASHINGTON Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:51pm EST

Eggs are pictured for sale at a Washington supermarket, August 23, 2010. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Eggs are pictured for sale at a Washington supermarket, August 23, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate passed the largest overhaul of the U.S. food safety system in decades on Tuesday, a response to massive recalls such as last summer's recall of half a billion eggs in a salmonella outbreak.

The Senate voted 73-25 to pass the bill. The House of Representatives backed a different version in July 2009. With their post-election session due to end by mid-December, lawmakers have just weeks to resolve their differences and send legislation to President Barack Obama to sign into law.

"I urge the House -- which has previously passed legislation demonstrating its strong commitment to making our food supply safer -- to act quickly on this critical bill, and I applaud the work that was done to ensure its broad bipartisan passage in the Senate," Obama said in a statement.

The Senate legislation would give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration the power to order a food recall when a company refuses the agency's request that it do so voluntarily.

It also would allow the agency to step up inspections at the riskiest food processing plants, expand FDA capabilities to trace the source of foodborne disease outbreaks such as E. coli and salmonella, and increase the number of FDA inspectors at food plants.

"Today's vote will finally give the FDA the tools it needs to help ensure that the food on dinner tables and store shelves is safe," said Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, a sponsor of the bill.

Pressure to overhaul the food safety system has grown after high-profile outbreaks of illness involving lettuce, peppers, eggs, peanuts, spinach and, most recently, eggs that have shaken public confidence in the safety of the food supply.

U.S. regulation of food safety is fragmented -- split up among federal agencies. Consumer activists have complained that industry is given too much power to police itself.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration oversees the bulk of the U.S. food supply, but about 20 percent of the supply is overseen by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


The legislation would deliver the biggest changes in the U.S. food safety system since 1930s.

The Senate measure would give the FDA more access to food processors' records. It also would require food makers to have a written food safety plan describing risk at their facilities and controls they use to prevent contamination.

A key difference between the two versions of the bill passed by lawmakers is language in the Senate measure applying a softer regulatory hand to small farms and food processors than to big companies.

Family-farm groups said the Senate language was a common-sense recognition that small producers who market directly in their regions operate in a different setting than multi-state or national food processors and retailers.

But industry groups like the National Cattlemen's Beef Association said there should be a single, uniform federal standard when it comes to food safety.

Consumer groups and food industry trade groups called on Congress to enact a final version of the bill before adjourning next month.

The Senate bill would:

-- require food makers to write a plan that identifies contamination risks and steps to keep food pure;

-- allow the FDA wide access to a food maker's records during a food emergency;

-- require importers to verify the safety of their merchandise;

-- allow the FDA to deny entry into the United States of imported food from plants that refuse U.S. inspection;

-- and permit the FDA to withhold food from sale for a short time if the food might be contaminated or mislabeled.

Outbreaks of foodborne illnesses have been linked to peanut butter and contaminated produce, and recently a large salmonella outbreak was linked to contaminated eggs, forcing the recall of more than half a billion eggs.

(Reporting by Charles Abbott; Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (11)
mward1921 wrote:
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act – Title I: Improving Capacity to Prevent Food Safety Problems
These 25 Republican Gent’s
voted nay to the bove bill one could only assume they do believe that everyone is an educated consumer and knows tainted food when they see it.
(or investor) should know a lie when you see regardless which republican told it.

Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Not Voting
Brownback (R-KS), Not Voting
Bunning (R-KY), Nay
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Ensign (R-NV), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Isakson (R-GA), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Nay
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Risch (R-ID), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Wicker (R-MS), Nay
Republicans for
Alexander (R-TN),
Brown (R-MA), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Johanns (R-NE), Yea
Kirk (R-IL), Yea
LeMieux (R-FL), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea

Nov 30, 2010 3:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
craigoxford wrote:
This is an outrage. We are trying to save money and these incompetent fools – are trying to grow government!!!! Can’t anyone understand – we are broke and these fools are creating more debt!!! Leave the growers, producers, and bsuinesses alone and let them work!!!!!

Nov 30, 2010 3:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
8bh987 wrote:
This is a real joke. HACCP was passed into law in 1986. Shame on Dick Durbin for now jumping on the band wagon to “toughen” regulations. More money should have been spent in the last 24 years for inspectors for the FDA and real authority given to them to shut down violators immediately.

Most large production facilities will only do the minimum to comply with the FDA as they know the agency has no bite due to the ignorance of Congress to give the bite it takes to make out food, drugs, cosmetics, pets and environment safe.

Shame on you Dick Durbin for bandwagoning.

Do the right thing, spend the money to safe guard the health of those that receive goods from US producers.

By the way if you spend government money by allowing having inspectors, investigators, more staff to follow up and prosecute offenders then you will be creating jobs and insuring the safety of products (that fall under the FDA guidelines) are safe for the US and the citizens of any country they are sent as export products.

It’s a win/win, this bill is nothing but a political ploy by a member of Congress who has no understanding of the rules already in place nor the lack of resources the FDA has.

I am not, nor have ever been, an employee of the FDA. I am a concerned and informed citizen that is appalled by Durbin’s ignorance.

Nov 30, 2010 3:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.