Deficit panel recalibrates, seeks more support

Senate staff members pick up copies of U.S. President Barack Obama's 2011 Budget as it is distributed on Capitol Hill in Washington February 1, 2010. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Senate staff members pick up copies of U.S. President Barack Obama's 2011 Budget as it is distributed on Capitol Hill in Washington February 1, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Wed Dec 1, 2010 4:23pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A presidential commission trying to balance the U.S. budget on Wednesday softened a proposed tax overhaul to win broader support for its bold plan to slash the $1.3 trillion federal deficit.

The plan faced an uphill struggle to win sufficient backing to trigger a congressional vote. Even if that happens, analysts predict Congress won't take substantive steps to reduce the deficit this year.

Changes made to the plan included dropping a proposal to kill the popular mortgage interest tax deduction, as had been recommended on November 10. The revised version proposed a limited, 12 percent mortgage interest tax credit.

In an attempt to attract backing from elected lawmakers on the 18-member commission, the revised plan also backed off a proposal to tax capital gains and dividends as ordinary income and suggested a 20 percent investment income exclusion.

Two key senators -- Democrat Kent Conrad and Republican Judd Gregg -- said they would support the plan at a meeting on Wednesday. A final commission vote is set for Friday.

The panel's co-chairmen need 14 "yes" votes to trigger a congressional vote on the proposal. President Barack Obama set up the commission in February.

The panel's revised plan envisages reducing the budget deficit to 2.3 percent of gross domestic product by 2015, from 8.9 percent in the last fiscal year -- a figure bloated by efforts to lift the U.S. economy out of its deepest recession since the 1930s, Bush-era tax cuts and two costly wars.

To accomplish that goal, the plan urges deep cuts in military and domestic programs starting in 2012, a 15 cent per gallon hike in the gas tax and requiring Medicare participants to pay more costs themselves. It also recommends raising the age for receiving Social Security benefits.

SEVEN VOTES FOR PLAN

At Wednesday's meeting, seven commission members, including co-chairmen Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, expressed support for the plan; one member voiced opposition; and the remainder expressed concerns without committing one way or the other.

Bowles was chief of staff for former Democratic President Bill Clinton. Simpson is a former Republican senator.

Bowles vowed not to retreat from the hardest-hitting aspects of the plan, a result of months of debate. "Al and I are not going to wimp out. For us, it's go big or go home ... We're not interested in 14 votes for a whitewash," Bowles said.

Democratic Representative Jan Schakowsky, a commission member, said "I can't support it and will be voting no."

Republican Representative Paul Ryan said: "I don't believe this sufficiently fixes the healthcare problem."

AARP, which represents millions of older Americans, said the plan would cut Social Security too deeply and raise Medicare costs for beneficiaries.

"The latest report on deficit reduction would actually increase the health and economic insecurity of millions of Americans," AARP Executive Vice President John Rother said.

The commission's work came to a head amid an escalating debt crisis in Europe that offered a reminder of the value of fiscal restraint. But fears that the contagion could spread has driven investors into U.S. Treasury bonds, holding down the government's borrowing costs.

A fierce debate also was under way on Capitol Hill over Bush-era tax cuts that played a key role in boosting the deficit close to levels not seen since World War Two.

Extending the Bush tax cuts would drive the deficit higher. Obama has argued for letting them lapse for families earning more than $250,000 a year. Republicans, who take control of the House of Representatives in January after November's Democratic election defeats, say any lapse would harm the economy.

PLAN CUTS DEFICIT

As in the draft, which was widely criticized, the commission's revised plan calls for lower corporate tax rates and targets $4 trillion in deficit reduction through 2020.

It freezes 2012 discretionary spending at 2011 levels and returns it to pre-crisis 2008 levels in 2013, while capping its growth beyond 2013 at half the projected inflation rate.

In a largely symbolic gesture, it recommends cutting the budgets of the White House and Congress by 15 percent and immediately freezing the salaries of members of Congress, along with a three-year freeze on non-military federal worker pay and a reduction of 200,000 jobs from the federal workforce.

Instead of ending the charitable gift tax deduction, as the draft proposed, the revision calls for a 12 percent credit.

The revision also calls for a payroll tax holiday of $50 billion to $100 billion in 2011; reducing the number of income tax brackets to three from six; eliminating congressional budget earmarks; and creating new budget categories for overseas military operations and disaster relief.

(Additional reporting by Andy Sullivan, Alister Bull and Kim Dixon; Editing by Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (33)
PMW wrote:
Given the bitter and destructive partisanship with its fanatical resistance to any tax increases, President Obama should let all of the Bush tax-cuts expire. This alone will provide the $4 trillion the the bipartisan panel was seeking through an endless array of spending cuts and new taxes. The taxes were never needed except to satisfy the rich and the ideologues who want to “starve” the government. U.S. tax rates are historically low and the President needs to lead rather tha to continue to compromise with those who see compromise as a pne-way street running in their direction. The whole deficit issue is a “tar baby” that will keep the President from doing what he should have done in his first two year–create jobs for ordinary Americans, not just the Wall Street bankers and investment wizards who caused the world-wide economic meltdown of 2008.

Nov 30, 2010 8:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Trooth wrote:
And these are the people we want to make life or death decisions for our healthcare.

Nov 30, 2010 8:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Tuco_bad wrote:
President Barack Obama’s deficit commission recommended cuts in Social Security benefits to lessen the projected future Social Security shortfalls. However, my demographic group and future groups are putting in as much money into Social Security as we will be taking out. The Social Security deficit is due to our government’s generosity to past generations of Americans that received much more in benefits than they put in.

But it was the mothers of the past generations that gave up their children to fight and oftentimes die for our country in World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War. And I do not lose any sleep with our country’s largess, as I believe it well deserved.

The question is how to close the deficit caused by our government’s past generosity: Should the Social Security deficit be closed by cutting benefits for future Social Security recipients, or by raising the Social Security tax, or by taxing people on their ability to pay (i.e.; progressive income tax), or simply printing more money (Federal Reserve quantitative easing)?

Nov 30, 2010 9:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.