Warren downplays role of rules in consumer agency

WASHINGTON Thu Dec 2, 2010 9:33am EST

Consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren listens as President Barack Obama announces her as the special adviser leading the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington September 17, 2010. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren listens as President Barack Obama announces her as the special adviser leading the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington September 17, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The goal of the new U.S. consumer protection agency should be to make financial products easier to understand rather than to restrict specific business practices through regulations, President Barack Obama's top consumer adviser said on Thursday.

Elizabeth Warren argued that companies and their lawyers can find ways around government prohibitions, but making financial products such as mortgages and credit cards easier to understand will empower consumers.

"Regulations should be about making sure that customers have the information they need to make the decisions that are right for them," Warren said in remarks prepared for delivery at a meeting of the Consumer Federation of America.

Warren acknowledged there is skepticism about how effective disclosure of information can be in aiding consumers, but said the goal of the new agency should be clarity.

"No customer should be asked to take out a loan without knowing the costs or the risks of the deal," she said.

Obama tapped Warren in September to help set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was established by the new financial reform law and is scheduled to officially launch in July.

The financial industry, particularly banks, vehemently opposed the bureau's creation, arguing it will stifle the innovation of new products and strangle profits through overregulation. Republicans, who will control the House of Representatives next year, have promised to thoroughly review the bureau's activities and attempt to restrict its power by trying, among other things, to limit its budget.

Warren has been making the rounds since September to try to sell the public on the bureau while also attempting to ease industry fears that the new agency will rely heavily on prohibitive regulations.

"The problem is that thou-shall-not rules do not fundamentally change the credit markets," Warren told the Consumer Federation of America, which is a major booster of the agency.

Instead, she said, the bureau should push to make products easier to understand so consumers know the terms of contracts and can compare what different companies are offering.

Warren pointed to a recent law seeking to rein in abuses in the credit card industry as evidence that restrictive rules can be circumvented.

"Right now, there are a lot of lawyers who are working overtime to figure out how to render the CARD Act rules ineffective," she said.

(Reporting by Dave Clarke, Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Alfred.Brock wrote:
If mortgage brokers helping to sell HUD homes financed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to lie about what they are doing and continue to sell properties at inflated prices and act as predatory corporations in order to benefit themselves then this political bantering will remain just that – talk, talk, talk. I wonder if the Federal Government is planning on issuing its own credit cards next…borrow against future tax refunds…low cost rates…trust us…trust…us…

Dec 03, 2010 7:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.