Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Republicans cool to "do not track" Web plan

Related Topics

Bloggers sit in front of computers while watching the Republican Debate from a bar in Manchester, New Hampshire in this January 5, 2008 file photo. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi/Files

Bloggers sit in front of computers while watching the Republican Debate from a bar in Manchester, New Hampshire in this January 5, 2008 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Jessica Rinaldi/Files

WASHINGTON | Thu Dec 2, 2010 5:44pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans, who will control the House of Representatives in January, greeted the idea of Internet "do not track" legislation coolly on Thursday, expressing concern that hindering advertiser access to consumers web browsing habits would slow innovation.

Their opposition bodes badly for the Federal Trade Commission as it promotes a plan to allow consumers to bar data and advertising companies from monitoring what websites they view and what content they download.

Representative Ed Whitfield, the ranking Republican on the House consumer protection subcommittee, expressed concern that the free services now financed by advertising would be hurt, and that consumers would lose access to ads they want to see.

"We need to be mindful not to enact legislation that would hurt a recovering economy," he said at a hearing to discuss the plan.

Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, worried that "do not track" could stifle innovation. "We must first look to self-regulation," he told lawmakers.

David Vladeck, director of the FTC's Consumer Protection Bureau, argued that there was strong public support for allowing people to block tracking and that the idea was technically feasible.

If Congress authorized the FTC to rule in this area, Vladeck also asked that the FTC be allowed to slap violators with civil penalties.

Daniel Weitzner, who works on privacy issues with the Commerce Department, said that he disagreed with the notion that giving Internet users control over who collected their data was the death knell for online advertising.

"Internet users have been given more and more control ... and advertiser revenue has not gone down. It's a mistake to assume that giving people more control means a reduction in advertising revenue," he said at the hearing.

Separately, Massachusetts Democrat Senator John Kerry said on Wednesday that he planned to introduce privacy legislation, and that he believed that consumers should be allowed to opt out of having their data collected.

Democrats will retain control of the Senate next year, but with a reduced majority.

Representative Ed Markey, a Democrat who promoted a 1998 bill requiring parental consent before websites can collect data on children, said on Thursday that would he would introduce a bill next year that would include a do-not-track mechanism for children.

The FTC has urged that special care be taken with information about sensitive topics such as finances, health, children or an individual's location.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
Ralphooo wrote:
“We need to be mindful not to enact legislation that would hurt a recovering economy”

Ain’t Republicans the best?

Dec 02, 2010 6:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
uunnnggghhhh wrote:
Of course they would be ‘cool’ to the idea. The corporations that control them would lose possible revenue from the ads placed all over the internet. Of course, they could do it the old fashion way, and just post the ad without knowledge of the consumers spending habits. We are doomed….DOOMED I TELL YOU!

Dec 02, 2010 7:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mward1921 wrote:
The only way to assure that there is fairness on this bill is to allow the Printing service to post advertisement on the bills as they are printed or even better let them flash an ad on the senate wall advertising the advantages of condom use for senators. Advertisers over utilize the internet services put me on the do not track list now if that is the next proposal right next to the do not call list that they don’t seem to honor in India or other American service companies.

Dec 02, 2010 8:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.