Lawyer for WikiLeaks' Assange denies warrant valid

Related Topics

Related Video

1 of 2. The homepage of the WikiLeaks.org website is pictured in Beijing December 2, 2010. Amazon.com Inc has stopped hosting WikiLeaks' website after an inquiry by the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee.

Credit: Reuters/Petar Kujundzic

LONDON/STOCKHOLM | Thu Dec 2, 2010 5:03pm EST

LONDON/STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - The lawyer acting for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange denied on Thursday that Sweden had issued a valid European arrest warrant for alleged sex crimes, despite Stockholm's insistence that legal difficulties with the warrant were resolved.

Swedish police earlier said technical problems hindering the arrest of the 39-year-old Australian had been ironed out, and a newspaper report said he was in Britain.

But in an interview with Reuters, his London lawyer Mark Stephens, who would not divulge his whereabouts because of death threats against him, said no warrant valid under Swedish, European or international law had been issued.

"There is no arrest warrant against him. There was an Interpol red notice, which is not a warrant, alerting authorities to monitor his movements," Stephens told Reuters.

"The arrest warrant was sent back by Scotland Yard (London police headquarters) because it did not comply with the law and was defective."

Assange spends much of his time in Sweden, and earlier this year was accused of sexual misconduct by two Swedish women. Swedish prosecutors opened, then dropped, then re-opened an investigation into the allegations.

Sweden has authorized a warrant for his arrest on suspicion of sexual misconduct. But Assange has not been formally charged with any crime in Sweden.

Stephens also told Reuters his client had not been informed of the allegations or shown any evidence against him. He said his client would be happy to meet Swedish prosecutors but they had not wanted to meet him.

"We are in this position where we have never been told what the allegations are against him, we do know that he hasn't been charged, we do know that he has only been asked for as a witness," he said.

The Independent newspaper said Assange had arrived in Britain in October, and had given police his contact details. It cited police sources who said they knew where Assange was staying. He is believed to be in southeast England, it said.

TECHNICAL PROBLEMS

In Sweden, Assange's efforts to have an arrest order quashed met defeat when the High Court declined to hear the case.

"The High Court has not granted a leave to appeal, so the Svea Court of Appeals ruling still stands," High Court official Kerstin Norman told Reuters. The Svea Court of Appeals is one of six courts of appeal and covers the Stockholm area.

The Independent, citing unnamed sources, said Britain's Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) needed clarification about the European Arrest Warrant issued by Swedish prosecutors before British police could arrest Assange.

The Metropolitan Police and Soca declined to comment when contacted by Reuters.

Tommy Kangasvieri, head of the international unit at the Swedish National Police force, said the problem over the arrest warrant had been solved.

"We have sorted this out and it will be completed during the day," he said, adding that Swedish police had not received any official word that Assange was in Britain.

Swedish Prosecution Office spokeswoman Helena Ekstrand said the office had received no information on Assange's location. "...the arrest warrant still stands and we are looking for Julian Assange," she said.

U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley, interviewed by BBC Radio 4, said Assange had failed to cooperate with a U.S. investigation into the leak.

"We've made clear in an exchange this weekend with Mr Assange the fact that he is in possession of classified material of the United States government, it's stolen property and we have asked him to return it. He has declined to do that and we would investigate the implications of this."

(Additional reporting by Adrian Croft, Michael Holden and Michel Rose; editing by Tim Pearce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (27)
TopGunHo wrote:
Now where are those files fabricating trumped up charges and getting interpol on it, the smear campaigns and telling americans they ought to afraid of everything and the DDOS attacks on wikileaks.

Rueters saw it journalists being gunned down by US military I wonder whose side they are on.

Dec 01, 2010 7:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
I will NEVER buy anything from Amazon again for their caving to the likes of Lieberman and the US Government on the issue of free speech.

BOYCOTT the cowards.

Dec 01, 2010 7:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
GioCiampa wrote:
Would this be the security crackdown they should have started a decade ago when Gary McKinnon waltzed through the non-existent security at the Pentagon and NASA?

I’ll believe it when I see it…

Dec 01, 2010 8:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.