U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Iran talks were difficult: U.S. official

Related Topics

GENEVA | Tue Dec 7, 2010 10:33am EST

GENEVA (Reuters) - Talks between six major powers and Iran over its nuclear program were "difficult and candid" but must lead to practical steps by Tehran to assuage global concerns, a senior U.S. administration official said Tuesday.

The official, who asked not to be named, underlined how difficult future talks would be by noting that the six powers, known as the P5+1, insisted that Iran must suspend its enrichment of uranium -- something categorically rejected by Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili.

"Suspension is mandated by several Security Council resolutions. That is still the position of the P5+1," the official told reporters.

Earlier Jalili told a news conference that enrichment would not be on the agenda at the next meeting, which the two sides had agreed to hold in Istanbul in late January.

"I am announcing openly and clearly that Iran will not discuss a uranium enrichment halt in the next meeting in Istanbul with major powers," Jalili said.

The six powers -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany -- fear that Iran's nuclear program is a cover for acquiring an atomic bomb, while Tehran insists it is aimed at producing electricity.

The senior U.S. official confirmed that the United States did not have a formal bilateral meeting with Iran during this week's two days of talks in Geneva between the six powers and Tehran. But it had had opportunities to communicate its main points.

"We had several informal interactions which were useful to reinforce our main concerns," the official told reporters.

One way for Iran to build confidence would be to revise a deal reached at a previous round of talks over a year ago, but never implemented, to exchange low-enriched uranium for fuel to run an Iranian medical research reactor, he suggested.

Asked how long Washington was prepared to wait for progress, he said: "The measure ultimately becomes practical steps... to build a sense of trust that just does not exist now."

(Editing by Jonathan Lynn and Mark Trevelyan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
carpenter1 wrote:
Do you remember an old duo? Chamberlain and Hitler? Apparently, a lot of idiots have forgotten.

Dec 07, 2010 11:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
Logical123 wrote:
How stupid can the US and others in P4+1 be? Don’t they understand a simple statement of fact. Enrichment is allowed under the NPT and no amount of jumping up and down by the West will make Iran stop its enrichment activities. There is zero justification for asking Iran to stop its peaceful nuclear program. The first order of business should be to cancel all the illegal sanctions against Iran. Then, perhaps, some meaningful discussion is possible. Until then, all discussions are totally useless. What is so hard to understand about this simple fact.

The height of hypocrisy is that that all the countries in P4+1, except Germany, already possess nuclear weapons, yet they expect Iran to suspend its peaceful nuclear activities. There should be a basic IQ test for those who participate in these negotiations.

Dec 07, 2010 2:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
shakur420 wrote:
Funny how this institution is called “news”. Those of you who pretend to be journalists, should be ashamed of yoursleves for thinking that the general public is that stupid. How does Russia “fear that Iran’s nuclear program is a cover for acquiring an atomic bomb”, when they’ve been actively saying the opposite all the while helping them build nuclear plants? Facts that have been reported by this very company that parades itself as something other than a mouthpiece for the state. Logical123 also brings up the other, more important point. Why is this even a problem? How is Iran a “threat” to anyone? How many countries has Iran invaded? How many nuclear bombs has Iran used? How many governments has Iran overthrown. Most importantly, to keep to international law and undisputible facts. Who is the only country in history to be convicted under international law for the severe crime of illegal aggression? Not Iran, I’ll tell you that much.

Pathetic, really.

Dec 07, 2010 4:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.