U.S. drops push for Israel settlement freeze

JERUSALEM Tue Dec 7, 2010 6:16pm EST

Rows of apartment blocks under construction are seen in the West Bank Jewish settlement of Givat Zeev near Jerusalem November 18, 2010. REUTERS/Baz Ratner

Rows of apartment blocks under construction are seen in the West Bank Jewish settlement of Givat Zeev near Jerusalem November 18, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Baz Ratner

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The United States on Tuesday abandoned its effort to persuade Israel to freeze construction of Jewish settlements, officials said, dealing a blow to efforts to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

President Barack Obama brokered the direct talks that were relaunched in September but broke down over the issue of settlements built on captured land that Palestinians seek for a state.

"We reached the conclusion this is not the time to renew direct negotiation by renewing the moratorium," a senior U.S. diplomat told reporters in Israel, ending weeks of intense U.S. diplomacy aimed at forging a settlement deal.

Palestinians have said they would not engage in any direct talks while Israelis build on territory seized in the 1967 Middle East War.

The decision marked a significant foreign policy setback for Obama, who had appealed personally to Israel to extend its temporary construction freeze.

Obama, in launching the talks in September, said he hoped to have a peace deal signed in a year, but the lack of a settlement agreement and the collapse of direct talks appeared to put that timeline in doubt.

In Washington, officials said the United States was weighing a return to indirect talks following its failure to revive the direct negotiations.

Two officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, gave three reasons why the Obama administration decided to abandon the effort.

They said that while Israel was willing to extend the moratorium, it was not willing to freeze construction in East Jerusalem, something Palestinian officials had demanded as they want that part of the city as capital of their state.

"(Extending) the moratorium did not close the gap between the two parties," said one U.S. official.

Second, the officials said that unless they made sufficient progress during a temporary Israeli extension of the moratorium they could end up in the same place in three months -- still struggling to keep the peace process alive.

"We had to be prepared to think that substantial progress could be made in 90 days," said the same U.S. official, suggesting there was enough uncertainty about this that it did not seem worth proceeding.

Finally, they said that there were some concerns about the size of the incentives the United States offered Israel -- which Israeli sources said included 20 F-35 stealth fighters worth $3 billion -- for only a temporary extension.

"NOT THROWING IN THE TOWEL"

The officials said one possibility they would explore with senior Israeli and Palestinian officials who are expected to visit Washington -- possibly within the next week -- would be resuming indirect peace talks.

"In the coming days and weeks we will engage both sides on the core substantive issues at stake in this conflict," a U.S. official said.

"We're not throwing in the towel at all. Our objective is still a framework agreement ... (but) we are going to look for a different mechanism," the official said.

Israeli officials had no immediate comment, while a spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said he was studying the U.S. decision..

"The president received a letter from the American administration. The president will respond to the letter after he consults with the Palestinian leadership and the Arab leaders," Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rdainah said.

Senior members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's pro-settler ruling coalition had criticized the demands for a settlement moratorium as tantamount to setting preconditions for peace talks and urged him to reject any U.S. offer.

Abbas suggested in a television interview on Friday he may seek to dissolve the Palestinian government, a limited form of self-rule agreed in an interim deal in 1993, if a deal for statehood could not be achieved.

Palestinian officials have said they may seek to declare statehood unilaterally in the occupied West Bank if negotiations with Israel foundered.

Three Latin American nations -- Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay -- declared recognition of a Palestinian state at the weekend, drawing Israeli condemnation.

(Additional reporting by Dan Williams in Jerusalem, Mohammed Assadi in Ramallah and Arshad Mohammed in Washington; writing by Allyn Fisher-Ilan; editing by Angus MacSwan and Mohammad Zargham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
amos033 wrote:
All this is heading to the prophecy given to us in the Bible:

“And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.” Zechariah 12:3

Every nation in the world will line up against Israel and try to take Jerusalem. Even as I type this, Brazil, Argentina and others are planning to recognize a new Palestinian State based on 1967 borders.

President Obama will instruct his UN Ambassador not to veto a resolution calling for the creation of the Palestinian state.

Then the Lord will intervene:

“In that day shall the Lord defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the Lord before them.” Zecharia 12:8

Dec 07, 2010 3:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JustAGuy wrote:
Wow! Obama is retreating all over the place. For the last two years, Obama retreated internationally, now after the November elections, Obama is retreating from his agenda.

Dec 07, 2010 3:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Cru wrote:
Wow.. we just gave up on that one.

Dec 07, 2010 4:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.