FDA cannot block e-cigarette imports: U.S. court

WASHINGTON Wed Dec 8, 2010 11:18am EST

An 'e-cigarette' package, which contains two cigarette-shaped devices, a cigarette holder and a battery charger, is displayed in Hong Kong May 9, 2007. REUTERS/Bobby Yip

An 'e-cigarette' package, which contains two cigarette-shaped devices, a cigarette holder and a battery charger, is displayed in Hong Kong May 9, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Bobby Yip

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration can only regulate "e-cigarettes" as tobacco products and not as drugs, and thus cannot block their import, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Tuesday.

The ruling by three judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit infuriated tobacco activist groups and will allow e-cigarette maker Sottera Inc. to start importing its NJOY products.

"Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered products that allow users to inhale nicotine vapor without fire, smoke, ash, or carbon monoxide," the court said in its ruling.

"The liquid nicotine in each e-cigarette is derived from natural tobacco plants."

Congress gave the FDA authority to regulate tobacco products -- but not to ban them -- in 2009.

The ruling affirms a lower court decision from January. "The FDA's refusal to admit NJOY's products into the United States obviously destroyed the firm's ability in the United States to cover its costs for purchase or production of e-cigarettes," the appeals court said.

Sottera Inc. which markets NJOY products as an alternative to cigarettes, welcomed the ruling.

"The ultimate impact of this court decision will be to lift the current import restrictions on NJOY electronic cigarettes and provide a regulatory framework for NJOY to make progress on its mission to be the most responsible electronic cigarette manufacturer on the market," the company said in a statement.

Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said it would take time for the FDA to assert its jurisdiction over e-cigarettes as tobacco products.

"This decision will allow any manufacturer to put any level of nicotine in any product and sell it to anybody, including children, with no government regulation or oversight at the present time," Myers said in a statement.

"We urge the government to appeal this ruling."

In September, the FDA sent warnings to five makers of electronic cigarettes, saying they were marketing them illegally as stop-smoking aids, and said it intended to regulate the products as drugs.

In October e-cigarette maker Smoking Everywhere Inc settled a civil suit brought by California by agreeing not to target sales and advertising to minors or to claim that its products are safe alternatives to tobacco.

Sales of Smoking Everywhere products are banned outright to anyone under 18 years of age as part of the settlement.

(Editing by Julie Steenhuysen and Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
emag wrote:
There are those of us who actually LIKE nicotine (yes, we’re addicted. Get over it, we have.). I use lozenges during the day but like using an e-cig in the evening or when at a bar. I don’t smoke….but I used to. I have no problem with FDA regulation, but I DO have a problem with those who just want e-cigs banned because they don’t like anything that even resembles smoking.

Dec 07, 2010 10:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
2crudedudes wrote:
Nicotine is a drug, and as such, should be handled as one. Its so ridiculous for there be such a stupid double standard.

Nicotine: no medicinal purpose, kills thousands a year; legal.

Cannabis: multiple scientifically-proven medicinal uses, does not in it of itself kill anyone; illegal.

Dec 09, 2010 12:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
2crudedudes wrote:
The FDA’s refusal to admit NJOY’s products into the United States obviously destroyed the firm’s ability in the United States to cover its costs for purchase or production of e-cigarettes

This also bugs me.

Their primary concern is getting the company’s money back, not the potential health risk.

Dec 09, 2010 12:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.