U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Regulations hurt competitiveness: business group

WASHINGTON | Wed Dec 8, 2010 9:40am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A prominent U.S. business group on Wednesday urged the Obama administration to consider modifying some provisions of a broad-based financial regulatory overhaul that they said hurt American competitiveness.

The Business Roundtable, which includes chief executives from top U.S. firms, said the Dodd-Frank bill passed earlier this year will be costly to implement and won't be effective.

"What we want to do is stop, take a breather, fix those things that won't work the way they were intended to do," Ivan Seidenberg, chief executive of Verizon Communications as well as chairman of the business group.

The Business Roundtable said it was initiating "a conversation" with the administration on five broad areas where it thinks changes are needed, including education and health-care regulation as well as Wall Street reform.

It cited concern about provisions in the Dodd-Frank bill for more tightly regulating derivatives markets. "Simply put, end-users should not be subjected to bank-like regulation that will harm, not promote, economic recovery," the group said in a summary of the areas that it feels need change.

Seidenberg has been critical of the Obama administration in the past, charging that its zeal for regulation was creating uncertainty that was making it harder for businesses to raise capital and create jobs.

He told a press conference on Wednesday that President Barack Obama deserves credit for his efforts in promoting freer trade and said he wanted the Business Roundtable's effort to be "a positive event" driven by a desire for more dialogue.

"We are trying to encourage the country to focus on what we need to do to create jobs," he said.

(Reporting by Glenn Somerville, Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Cherlindrea wrote:
So basically it sounds like Seidenberg is saying, “don’t regulate us because it will harm the growth of our business. Leave it the same as it was before, when it all crashed and almost plunged us into a recession.” I love how CEOs seem to think that they’ll magically be different from how they were before if only the government stays away. Sadly, the idiots in the government believe the same charlatan promises.

Regulation may not be the best answer, but it’s either that or we replace all the CEOs *and* the whole government so that we can fix the broken system properly. Let’s see. . .which one of those two is more likely to happen. . .

Dec 08, 2010 10:02am EST  --  Report as abuse
Publius1791 wrote:
“We are trying to encourage the country to focus on what we need to do to create jobs,”

It seems that the Seidenberg has conveniently forgotten that the massive deregulation of the financial sector is exactly what has ultimately cost people their jobs – and their life savings.

To allow the same unfettered, free-wheeling thieves on Wall Street to continue business as usual is insane.

Dodd-Frank is not wide-sweeping enough. These two guys are shills for the financial services industry. Just check the campaign contributions from the financial sector to both men to see where their true loyalties are.

The popular belief that an unregulated financial sector is good for America has proven disastrous – that is unless you’re in the top 2 % of the American people.

Dec 08, 2010 10:53am EST  --  Report as abuse
Mott wrote:
Most of the regulations are aimed at bringing some accountability to unethical business and trade practices in the interest of healthy capitalism and are less little to do with – competitiveness or jobs.

Dec 08, 2010 11:02am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.