Analysis: Seed leaders Pioneer, Monsanto see S.Africa backlash

CHICAGO Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:00pm EST

1 of 2. A DuPont logo is pictured on the research center in Meyrin near Geneva August 4, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Denis Balibouse

CHICAGO (Reuters) - The derailment of DuPont's intended acquisition of a top South African seed company -- a deal that would have doubled DuPont's African seed business -- is emboldening activists opposed to creeping control by both DuPont and rival Monsanto of the lucrative emerging market.

Citing unfair control in South Africa by the two dominant U.S. seed companies, South African activists successfully convinced regulators this week to deny the bid by DuPont's agricultural unit, Pioneer Hi-Bred, to buy South Africa's largest seed company, Pannar Seed Ltd.

Now, opponents say they are planning to push for a regulatory investigation of the dominant position global seed leader Monsanto holds in the genetically modified seed sector in South Africa.

They argue allowing foreign corporate control of South Africa's seed supply would erode availability of traditional conventional seed varieties, hurt export business with countries opposed to biotech crops, and force farmers deep into debt to pay for expensive seeds that are the patented properties of the U.S. corporations.

"This is only the beginning of the battle over the control of seeds in (South Africa)," said Mariam Mayet, environmental attorney and director of the Africa Center for Biosafety (ACB).

Mayet said the group was preparing a study of Monsanto's seed holdings and all the licensing and cross-licensing agreements in South Africa, particularly those dealing with corn or maize. The group will make a formal application to the South African Competition Commission to investigate and take action to protect against "negative socioeconomic impacts," Mayet said.

The South African Competition Commission confirmed Wednesday it was rejecting Pioneer's proposed acquisition of Pannar Seed due to concerns about market concentration.

The deal would have doubled Pioneer's seed sales on the continent to $200 million, and would have given it access to a broad base of local germplasm.

Company officials had touted the deal as the company's largest ever, and said the 52-year-old South Africa-based seed germplasm company -- which specializes in maize and sorghum and operates seed businesses in nine African countries -- would help it broaden its infrastructure across the continent.

Pioneer's bid for a controlling stake in Pannar marked the latest in a series of moves by major agricultural companies to stake a claim in Africa as concerns mount about global food security and population growth.

Pioneer and Monsanto already saturate the United States with their specialized high-yielding corn and soybean crops. And both see Africa as a key part of their international expansion efforts, affording substantial profit opportunities.

Both companies argue their specialized seeds will make farmers more productive, improve local livelihoods and help lift up a continent stricken by poverty.

"You look at the continent of Africa that has basically been flatlined in agricultural productivity for the last number of decades," said Pioneer President Paul Schickler. "If you can triple the productivity of Africa overall, that has a great impact."

Both Monsanto and Pioneer have the bulk of their African business in South Africa, a country that is increasingly embracing biotech crops, and both are working to open up neighboring nations that balk at biotech.

The hybrid corn, or maize, market in South Africa is worth an estimated $250 million. Pioneer claims about a one-third market share and Schickler describes the business as "very successful."

"Farmers everywhere ... if they have the opportunity to improve their productivity ... they are willing to pay for that," Schickler said.

Monsanto would not disclose its market share, but its influence is undeniable. Pioneer officials say about 75 percent of the hybrid maize planted in South Africa includes biotech traits derived from Monsanto, including Pioneer sales of hybrids that contain Monsanto-patented traits.

Across all of Africa there are an estimated 75 million acres, or 30 million hectares, available for maize production. Average grain yields are just 1 tonne per hectare, only one-fifth of yields in developed countries.

"There is a lot needed in Africa," said Jesus Madrazo, leader of Monsanto's global commercial seeds and traits business. Monsanto has about 350 employees in Africa, compared with Pioneer's 300.

Both Monsanto and Pioneer have been adding to their market strength in Africa through alliances with local agricultural organizations and acquisitions.

But as both companies have expanded, criticism has grown, as some accuse Monsanto and Pioneer of using the specter of hunger and poverty to promote controversial genetic engineering that critics fear is not safe and not environmentally friendly.

"GM seeds are not the solution to food security. Patented GM crops are a major obstacle to local food security and sovereignty," said Glenn Ashton, a BIOWATCH spokesman.

The African Center for Biosafety, BioWatch South Africa NGO, and even some U.S. organizations argue against the expansion of the U.S. seed conglomerates in Africa.

"This is about livelihoods, what people get to eat, how it is grown, and environmental implications. You are going to have two American companies control it all," said Anuradha Mittal, executive director of The Oakland Institute, a policy think tank focused on social, environmental and economic issues.

"They try to hoodwink us by talking about it in terms of feeding Africa. It is nothing else than the takeover of African agriculture," she said.

Monsanto and Pioneer are undeterred.

"There is going to be a lot of discussion about why biotech makes sense," said Madrazo. "Africa needs to go objectively through that debate if Africa is going to embrace new technologies in the future."

(Reporting by Carey Gillam; editing by Jim Marshall)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Lucky101 wrote:
GMO seeds/food is just a money grabbing business with no concern for climate, native plants, or health. It distroys the local farms and infects everything in it’s path. It’s unhealthy in every sinse of the word. I think these high powered companies should be blown off the earth……what’s left of it. We only have one planet to live on…we need to bring it back to it’s natural state NOT add more poluted crap.
We can’t just get off….there’s no place else to go to get away from the distruction that is killing all of us and everyting beautiful about planet EARTH.
As far as the climate agreement…these dates and percentages of polution elimation are only MINIMUM numbers….there’s absolutley no reason countries cannot exceed them….HELLO!!!!

Dec 11, 2010 9:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.