Senate Republicans block 9/11 health bill

WASHINGTON Thu Dec 9, 2010 8:33pm EST

A firefighter stands with daughter during fourth anniversary of attacks on the World Trade Center in New York. REUTERS/Chip East

A firefighter stands with daughter during fourth anniversary of attacks on the World Trade Center in New York.

Credit: Reuters/Chip East

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked a bill that would provide medical care for firefighters and other responders to the September 11, 2001, attacks who developed illnesses from breathing toxic, dust-filled air.

The 57-42 procedural vote fell short of the 60 needed to advance major legislation in the 100-member chamber. The House of Representatives passed the bill in September and Senate action is needed to send it to President Barack Obama for his signature.

The $7.4 billion measure was one of a number of bills Senate Republicans have blocked as lawmakers push to complete their work for the year.

Republicans have vowed to block any legislation, other than bills to fund the U.S. government, until an impasse is resolved over extending expiring tax cuts for virtually all taxpayers, including the wealthiest Americans.

Republicans argue that allowing the tax cuts for the wealthiest to expire at the end of December as scheduled would hurt small businesses and undermine the sluggish U.S. economy.

They also have balked at the cost of the health measure.

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid ripped into what he described as Republican obstructionism.

"Republicans denied adequate health care to the heroes who developed illnesses from rushing into burning buildings on 9/11," Reid said. "Yet they will stop at nothing to give tax breaks to millionaires and CEOs, even though they will explode our deficit and fail to create jobs.

"That tells you everything you need to know about their priorities," he said.

The measure could be brought back to the Senate floor before the current Congress adjourns in the next several days.

When it became clear the bill would not muster 60 votes, Reid ended up voting "no" so he could call for another vote on the bill under Senate rules.

(Reporting by Donna Smith; Editing by Xavier Briand)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
awayneramsey wrote:
Bait and switch this is the Republican Oligarchists’ tactic. More money will not incentivize Republican businesses neither Democratic businesses to hire! These are brazen lies!

Dec 09, 2010 7:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
McBob08 wrote:
The “Being held hotsage” analogy is old, but it’s fully appropriate in this case. The Republicans are spitting in the faces of Americans; holding their health, wellbeing and financial future hostage to their greedy demands. There needs to be a procedure available in government that can block the effects of a filibuster, because that has way too much power, and isn’t even an official rule of congress.

The Republicans need to get their heads out of their own arses and start serving the typical Americans that voted them in, instead of Big Business and the Rich Elite.

Dec 09, 2010 8:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jeepmanjr wrote:
Harry Reid, you’re such a hypocritical little twerp! Just like the rest of the LibRatz.

Dec 09, 2010 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.