Justice Department set to appeal healthcare ruling

WASHINGTON Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:27pm EST

President Barack Obama speaks before signing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 at Harriet Tubman Elementary School in Washington December 13, 2010. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

President Barack Obama speaks before signing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 at Harriet Tubman Elementary School in Washington December 13, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Video

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department said on Tuesday it intends to appeal to a U.S. appeals court a ruling by a judge in Virginia declaring a key part of President Barack Obama's landmark healthcare law unconstitutional.

Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said the Virginia lawsuit at issue was one of a number of cases concerning the law pending before courts around the country, including four in which challenges were unsuccessful.

"Virginia's suit is based on a state statute that is not applicable nationwide, and the department believes this case should follow the ordinary course of allowing the courts of appeals to hear it first so the issues and arguments can be fully developed before the Supreme Court decides whether to consider it," she said in a statement.

Some Republican opponents have said the case should go next to the Supreme Court, bypassing the appeals court. By going through the appeals court, it could take more than a year for the issue to end up at the Supreme Court.

Schmaler said the provision at issue does not take effect until 2014. "So there is more than sufficient time for the courts to consider this case in their normal course of business," she said.

In his ruling on Monday, U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson sided with the state of Virginia and held that Congress exceeded its authority by requiring Americans to start buying health insurance in 2014 or face a fine.

(Reporting by James Vicini, editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (30)
simantoub wrote:
This is a very bad decision by Judge Hudson. A public option for health coverage should have been thought out for this not to happen. I wonder who is supporting this judge.

Dec 13, 2010 7:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
lceel wrote:
Not that I think Reuters or any other news service might be biased (where the heck is the Sarcasm Font when you need it), but where were the headlines when other judges, previously, found IN FAVOR of the law?

Granted, the fact that other judges did so find is mentioned in the story – but that fact never made headlines. So now we have the appearance, which Conservatives will love, that the law is in trouble, creating (or reinforcing) a negative mindset regarding the law in the mind of the public.

Shame on you. I expect “fair and balanced” from Fox. I thought you guys were better than that.

Dec 13, 2010 8:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
hsvkitty wrote:
Get rid of the business that in healthcare and make healthcare available for everyone. The businesses that are your healthcare “industry” lobbied to make it a useless piece of legislation. Why aren’t people lobbying for a better system rather then listening to those who would profit from it, whether it be the Insurance companies or those whose pockets they lined…

Dec 13, 2010 8:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.