China PM on India charm offensive, offers trade boost

NEW DELHI Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:54am EST

1 of 3. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (L) talks to India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh during Wen's ceremonial reception at the presidential palace in New Delhi December 16, 2010. Wen began a visit to India on Wednesday, pledging to improve market access for Indian companies and insisting the world was big enough for both Asian giants to prosper as partners.

Credit: Reuters/B Mathur

Related Video

Related Topics

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao pressed on with a charm offensive in India on Thursday, offering support for New Delhi's bid for a greater role in the United Nations and agreeing on an ambitious target of $100 billion in trade between the rising Asian powers by 2015.

Relations between the world's two fastest growing major economies are tense, despite the booming trade relationship between them. Nearly 40 years after they fought a war there are still rifts over disputed borders, and suspicion in New Delhi over China's regional ambitions and its close ties with arch-rival, Pakistan.

But both Wen and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh exchanged vows of amity and goodwill, appearing to brush under the carpet a series of differences that have dogged relations for decades.

"I believe with our joint efforts, through the visit, we'll be able to raise our friendship and cooperation to a high level in the new century," said Wen, standing alongside Singh at the Indian presidential palace after a formal red-carpet welcome ceremony.

Wen's visit, the first by a Chinese premier to India in five years, has looked carefully choreographed to improve ties between two countries that between them are home to more than a third of the world's population.

At least 34 Tibetan protesters were arrested for taking part in anti-China demonstrations in New Delhi on Thursday.

Arriving with more than 300 business leaders on Wednesday, Wen said that India and China were not rivals and there was room in the world for both powers to develop.

"There is a trust deficit, a trade deficit but certainly not a charm deficit," said broadcaster CNN IBN Deputy Editor Sagarika Ghose.

Singh responded in kind to Wen's effusive words before they went into a meeting behind closed doors: "A strong partnership between India and China will contribute to long-term, peace, stability, prosperity and development in Asia and the world."

BOOSTING TRADE

China's willingness to increasingly engage with India on key issues such as their dispute over boundaries, as well as free trade talks, could stem from a realization in Beijing that China needs India's support in increasingly significant international platforms such as the G20.

The two sides said they wanted bilateral trade to cross $100 billion by 2015 from $60 billion in 2010, partly driven by greater access for Indian firms to Chinese markets.

Wen offered plenty of compromises during his visit but gave few details on when and how the thorny issues, including reducing India's trade deficit with China, would be addressed.

India's trade deficit with China is by far the highest among its trade partners and could touch $25 billion this year, which would account for around a fifth of India's total expected annual deficit.

India has sought to diversify its trade basket, but raw materials and other low-end commodities such as iron ore still make up about 60 percent of its exports to China.

"We would like our pharmaceuticals, we would like our agricultural commodities and we would like our IT services, all of which we are brand leaders internationally, to come into China," said Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao said.

India and China are the world's fastest-growing major economies. But India fears China wants to curtail its rise as a global power, and is concerned about Beijing's close security ties with Pakistan where Wen arrives on Friday on the second part of his trip.

India and Pakistan have fought three wars since independence from Britain in 1947 and Delhi broke off peace talks after Pakistani militants attacked Mumbai in 2008, killing 166 people.

The China-India statement on Thursday outlined Beijing's support for U.N. Security Council Resolution 1267, which calls for sanctions against the Lakshar-e-Taiba militant group that New Delhi blames for the attack and accuses Pakistan of harboring.

India also fears China wants to restrict its global reach by possibly opposing its bid for a permanent U.N. Security Council seat or encircling the Indian Ocean region with massive projects from Pakistan to Myanmar.

China reiterated its support for India's aspirations to play a greater role in the Security Council, but it stopped short of expressing full backing for India.

CHARM OFFENSIVE

Long wary of Washington's influence in South Asia, Beijing's overtures toward New Delhi come just a little over a month after U.S. President Barack Obama's trip to India, during which he endorsed India's long-held demand for a permanent seat.

India has sewn up almost $50 billion in commercial deals with the United States, France and China over the past few weeks. The number of foreign leaders visiting, with Russia's president due next week, highlight the growing importance of India on the world stage.

Wen's avuncular style contrasts sharply with that of Singh, who is seen as shy and lacking charisma. Singh is also engulfed in what may be India's biggest corruption scandal, threatening the stability of the Congress party-led coalition government.

Wen announced on Wednesday that Chinese companies would sign deals with Indian firms worth more than $16 billion ranging from power equipment to telecoms gear -- underscoring business was driving the relationship, for now. Chinese banks will provide the bulk of lending for these deals.

Although both India and China have said they are exploring a possible free-trade agreement, no real progress was made on that front during the visit as there is skepticism in New Delhi that Beijing may only want to dump cheap manufactured goods on India's booming $1.3 trillion economy.

"Gradually, the whole relationship seems to be becoming better than before ... on the economic side, the private deals signed yesterday show things might be becoming a little more equitable," Bhaskar Roy, a political analyst told Reuters.

China is now India's largest trade partner and two-way trade is expected to reach $60 billion in 2010/11 compared with $3 billion in 2001/02 -- illustrating the phenomenal growth rate.

Still, total investment by China in India is small, amounting to only $221 million in 2009, representing about 0.1 percent of China's total outward foreign direct investment in that year. That figure is seven times less than what China has invested in Pakistan, according to official data.

While the two are often lumped together as emerging world powers, China's GDP is four times bigger than India's and its infrastructure outshines India's dilapidated roads and ports, a factor that makes New Delhi wary of Beijing's growing might.

(Additional reporting by C.J. Kuncheria, Henry Foy, Krittivas Mukherjee and Matthias Williams in NEW DELHI, Christopher Buckley in BEIJING; Writing by Paul de Bendern; Editing by Miral Fahmy and Alex Richardson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
vksaini wrote:
No denial that world is big enough for growth of China as well as India. Yet I hold firm view trust deficit between two Asian giants will not get reduced on the pillars of increase in trade & commerce alone. The issues pricking India time & again like constructions by China in POK, stapled visa to Kashmir people, incursions on borders, unjustified claim over Arunachal state territory etc. must get parallel & permanent resolutions in the shape of agreements. For India too, world is big enough to shop its requirements of goods & services at its own terms. Lastly India must not blindly leap frog the jump in trade unless finds solid positive results on the said pinpricks India has been bearing originating from China. Further China’s increase of its nuclear & other type of support to terrorists infested Pakistan is contrary to the extension of hand of friendship to India! India must never allow china to dump its cheap goods & services on India or India be prepared to face fate similar to U.S. is presently facing. Let all agreements be reached on give & take. India gives export market to China and China gives honourable solutions to India’s long outstanding problems with China reciprocally. Tell India is firm on it!

Dec 16, 2010 6:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
biztru wrote:
The world as it is, is already accomodating each and everyone who is wrote or read here. Trust deficits? US registers the same with each and every other nation, so do the other 190 over nations but whether they can do anything about it is another question. Everyone forgets that we are all human, in essence think alike (everyone fears losing) and suffers the same fate too – death, one way or another. There cannot be a zero sum game today. A destabled India or China is equally dangerous for the other. If China is close to Pakistan, there is nothing to stop India from being close to Japan, if India thinks that is beneficial. The Chinese will just continue to do business with India. A multipolar is already in existence. It depends on whether one acknowledges it or not. It is unlikely that the EU will be contend playing Robin’s role to US’ Batman role. US is still in the driver’s seat to be the first among equal. Would really like to see US organising some form of “Avengers” that includes everyone, a US that is charming, fair and friendly to all. If the torn to US is China, US can actually sit down with China over a cup of coffee to thrash out the differences. If US can win China’s absolute trust and support, then US can cut across the Atlantic and Pacific freely. Strictly speaking China has not fired a shot at the US before or present. The human race should actually be looking at frontiers beyond earth not fighting within, like medieval Europe of China. Wny not combine our different powers like the “Avengers” and venture afar?

Dec 16, 2010 7:33am EST  --  Report as abuse
kc10man wrote:
Any deal to increase Indian exports is wonderful. Their economy is rediculously undersized and sick compared to their population. But I would still be weary of this deal. The Chinese are definitely feeling around for ways to lower trade tariffs with anyone and this is a no difference.

Don’t forget that India and China’s relationship is still just as icy as China and Japan. China will continue to test the border and will use trade possibilities as a way to continue to push the rest of the world around.

Dec 16, 2010 7:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.