Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Waters of Nicaragua

Nicaragua has granted a Hong Kong company the right to build a $40 billion interoceanic canal.   Slideshow 

Photo

Paris Air Show

The latest from the 50th annual Paris Air Show.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Rep. Barney Frank critical of Fed debit card fee rule

WASHINGTON | Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:52pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve's proposal to limit debit card fees would not allow card companies to cover the full cost of transactions, House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank said in an interview on CNBC.

The proposal released on Thursday would generally limit debit "interchange" fees at 12 cents per transaction. The average interchange fee for all debit transactions was 44 cents in 2009, the Fed said.

"I think the way it was written, the amount the credit card companies are allowed to charge is too low," said Frank. "It does not reflect the full cost of all that you have to do if you are running a credit card operation."

Banks charge retailers the fees and merchants have long tried have a limit put in place.

The fee limit was included in the financial regulatory overhaul law enacted in July. Frank is one of the law's main authors and it is often referred to as Dodd-Frank, with Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd being the other lead author.

CardHub.com said on Friday it estimates the Fed proposal would cost banks $13 billion in revenue annually.

Frank expressed concern that whatever savings are achieved will not be passed on to the consumer.

"Unfortunately the evidence we've seen elsewhere is that consumers don't get any benefit," he said.

Analysts expect banks to make up for lost fees by curtailing rewards programs and increasing other fees.

Frank said the fee limit was added to the bill at the insistence of the Senate and that he would have preferred it had been left out.

Frank has also expressed concerns the limit will hurt small banks even though they are technically exempt from that provision of the law.

The rule, as required by the law, also seeks to introduce more competition into the card network market by requiring that transactions be able to be processed over more than one network, which analysts view as a blow to Visa and MasterCard.

(Reporting by Dave Clarke; Editing by Robert MacMillan and Richard Chang)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Tom_MacKnight wrote:
Now if the Feds would only cap usury fees at a reasonable level. For the most part these folks have been acting more like loan-sharks than banking institutions.

Dec 17, 2010 4:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Frank is ignoring that banks more than make-up losses (if that’s even possible with the debit fees it gouges from users) by cannibalizing their customers with overdraft and other usurious “value added” fees. I fear Frank’s fat cells are starting to outnumber his brain cells; and it’s apparent he needs to get out into the real world.

Dec 17, 2010 6:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Trooth wrote:
Why is one of the engineers of the current recession still giving us advice about banking? Shouldn’t he be quiet so he does not draw even more attention to himself?

Dec 17, 2010 7:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.