Democrats target prepaid debit card fees
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Fresh off a victory in their efforts to crack down on the debit card "swipe" fees that banks charge retailers, Democrats are setting their sights on the prepaid card market.
On Friday, a group of Senate Democrats introduced legislation that would limit the types of fees that could be charged on prepaid cards.
Overdraft, balance inquiry and customer service fees would be banned under the bill. It also would require more disclosure about fees being charged.
The legislation, which is still in early stages, would take a huge bite out of the growing prepaid card market that companies like Bank of America Corp and MasterCard Inc are increasingly exploring.
Mercator Advisory Group has forecast that funds loaded on prepaid cards will grow to $118.5 billion in 2012 from $36.6 billion in 2010. MasterCard recently forecast that prepaid volumes would reach more than $840 billion by 2017.
The legislation would be yet another blow to an industry that has faced a barrage of legislative and regulatory reforms, sending credit card companies in search of new profits.
On Thursday, the Federal Reserve proposed deep cuts in the debit card "interchange" fees that U.S. banks charge retailers. The proposal would also expose card networks Visa Inc and MasterCard to more competition, news of which sent shares of those companies reeling.
The prepaid industry targeted in the legislation released on Friday covers a range of cards -- from gift cards that can be used only at specific retailers or until a set amount is spent, to "general-purpose" cards that can be used like traditional debit or credit cards, as long as consumers keep reloading funds.
General purpose cards can replace bank accounts by accepting direct deposits directly onto the cards, and are generally marketed to younger, poor consumers, who rely heavily on cash and do not have much access to credit.
A recent effort by the celebrity Kardashian sisters to introduce a prepaid "Kardashian Kard" -- with fees that could reach at least $100 a year -- brought some negative public attention and notoriety to the prepaid industry and the fees some providers charge.
"We need to ensure that families who rely on prepaid cards are not surprised by hidden fees and are not hit with fees that are totally unnecessary," Democratic Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey, who introduced the bill, said in a release.
The bill has little chance of being enacted this year, but it sets a marker for the next Congress and illustrates that Democrats will continue their push for more regulation of the fees charged when consumers use a variety of cards.
"Today's legislation builds on the changes we've already begun to make and creates a new framework to ensure consumers aren't fleeced by prepaid cards," said Democratic Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, who was the leading proponent of the debit fee crackdown.
The bill would require the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp to issue regulations within nine months of enactment.
Banks have been slow to get into general-purpose prepaid cards, although Bank of America and others are exploring ways to introduce more of them. For the moment, the dominant prepaid providers are marketers Green Dot Corp and NetSpend Holdings Inc, which both went public this year.
Visa and MasterCard also are looking to expand their prepaid processing businesses. Last week, MasterCard agreed to spend $459 million on a prepaid business of foreign exchange group Travelex.
Following the Fed's proposal, industry members said more banks likely would steer their customers toward more lucrative products, including prepaid debit.
"You've now set interchange low enough that merchants now have every incentive in the world to steer people toward debit, but banks have every incentive in the world to steer people toward another product, like credit or prepaid debit," said Evan Staples, equity analyst with First American Funds, which owns shares of U.S. banks and Visa and MasterCard.
(Reporting by Dave Clarke in Washington and Maria Aspan in New York. Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Robert MacMillan)
- Radar showed missing plane may have turned back: Malaysia military
- Malaysian jetliner may have turned back before vanishing |
- Malaysian plane presumed crashed; questions over false IDs |
- CORRECTED-UPDATE 4-Malaysia Airlines plane crashes in South China Sea with 239 people aboard - report
- Russian forces tighten grip on Crimea despite U.S. warning |