China counters U.S. criticism of Pakistan

Related Topics

Related Video

1 of 5. China's Prime Minister Wen Jiabao (C) waves as his Pakistani counterpart Yusuf Raza Gilani (2nd L) applauds after Wen's arrival to the joint sessions of the National Assembly and Senate in Islamabad December 19, 2010. Also attending are Senate Chairman Farooq Naik (L) and Speaker of the National Assembly Fahmida Mirza (2nd R).

Credit: Reuters/Prime Minister's House/Handout

ISLAMABAD | Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:45am EST

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao lauded on Sunday Pakistan's efforts to battle al Qaeda, just days after the United States said its ally could do more to crack down on militants, especially along the Afghan border.

Wen's comments, made in a speech to parliament, appear part of China's strategy to lend support to old friend Pakistan, often criticized by the United States and many in the West as an unreliable, but necessary, ally in the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

"Strengthening and promoting strategic, brotherly relations is our joint strategic choice and they are in the interests of two countries and their people," Wen said, as he wrapped up a three-day visit to Pakistan.

Chinese leaders applaud Pakistan's efforts to fight al Qaeda -led terrorism, he added, urging the international community to "endorse and support" them.

"Pakistan has given great sacrifices and made great efforts in the fight against terrorism. It is a reality...and the international community should respect Pakistan's efforts," he said.

He said China would try to enhance cooperation with Pakistan in the endeavor.

Pakistan's porous border with Afghanistan is seen as a haven for militants and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday that it needed to do more to control the flow of extremists, which a U.S. review of the Afghan war said was the main obstacle to ending the conflict. [nWEN4597]

While boosting trade and investment has been the main focus of Wen's visit -- the first in five years by a Chinese premier -- analysts say the trip is about more than money.

"It's a clear signal of China's growing, assertive diplomacy," said independent analyst Hamayoun Khan.

"They (China) do not want Pakistan to be entirely dependent on the United States and the International Monetary Fund, and then get dictation from them," Khan said.

"China's massive investment in this time proves two things. One is that China is a genuine ally of Pakistan, and second, it is a clear signal to the U.S. that if the U.S. supports India against China, China will support Pakistan."

During the visit, which followed a three-day trip to India, the two countries signed commercial and trade deals worth at least $25 billion.

By comparison, Wen signed $16 billion in deals in India before arriving in Islamabad on Friday.

Analysts say China is investing in Pakistan to such a large degree for two reasons: because it sees the country as a genuine friend, and because it irks India.

Sino-Indian relations have been dogged by longstanding border disputes, which led to a war nearly four decades ago. Since then, though, the world's two fastest-growing big economies have forged a major trade relationship over the years.

China is the main supplier of defense and military hardware to Pakistan. China has also helped Pakistan to build its main nuclear power generation facility and is helping build another one.

Pakistani diplomats like to refer to China as an "all-weather friend," whose needs -- strategic and economic -- fit in with what Pakistan wants and has to offer.

China wants to use Pakistan as a gateway to the Muslim world and as a new Silk Road for China's energy-hungry interior, as well as a balance against India's military rise.

Pakistan, in turn, plans to further rely on China for the bulk of its weapon systems, as a major investor for its ports and roads, and as a counterweight to American demands and conditions in the fight against Islamist militancy.

(Additional reporting by Chris Allbritton, editing by Ron Popeski)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
vksaini wrote:
Pakistan is playing very deftly the game of saluting the rising Sun (China) and slowly & steadily withdrawing from dwindling world super power (U.S) however extracting maximum advantage from both, knowing very well decline of its influence when NATO forces withdraw from Afghanistan. U.S. is finding no way out from its unreliable but necessary ally for Afghanistan war against terror. The trend of events is forecasting that under surface complete polarization of Pakistan towards China has taken place which is only awaiting its declaration at any moment U.S. deals tough with Pakistan!

Dec 19, 2010 7:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
mgunn wrote:
Pakistan has helped more than we give credit for. None of the 911 terrorists were Pakistani. They just don’t have oil like the Saudis do so we criticize them more. Musharraf understood well when he said the US uses countries like condoms, use them then throw them away. They are extremely poor, yet were pivotal in helping us supply the resistance against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They allow foreign drones to survey their land and kill suspected militants that unfortunately kill civilians too. How many countries would let a foreign power do that? And they have had offensives against militants that have resulted in thousands of soldiers dying. All this while they are preoccupied with horrific floods and earthquakes and a powerful enemy to the south. We are the richest country in the world yet we can’t even guard our border with Mexico, how can we expect this impoverished country to successfully regulate its long lawless border with Afghanistan?

Dec 19, 2010 11:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
Let China have Pakistan and fight terrorists there. Therefore, US troops can withdraw from Afghanistan that would please Al Qaeda. You feel that American people are evil, and then wait until you meet ruthless Communist Chinese troops with their evil sinister faces! There will be a million more Chinese troops on the way to your secret hideout on the border of Afghanistan because China is your next-door neighbor country that made them easier to transport to terrorize Al Qaeda. They will dare to machine-gun on your people without any regardless of human rights because I had experienced with wicked Communist Chinese troops. Pakistanis people will be regret after USA left because Pakistan will be poor without financially help from USA. We do not need Pakistan and it is a time for us to leave this corruption-rife place. Let China bring troops to Afghanistan. British tried it, Russian tried it, USA tried it and they failed. Let China go there and try to clean up the mess in Afghanistan and unstable Pakistan. Good luck to Red Communist China.

Dec 20, 2010 1:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.