Congress repeals ban against gays in military

Related Topics

1 of 4. U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) (C) and Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) (R) appear at a news conference after the passage of a procedure hurdle to lead to the probable repeal of the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy against homosexuals serving in the military, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, December 18, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:20am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congress on Saturday repealed the ban against gays serving openly in the military, a major victory for President Barack Obama who had promised to end what his liberal supporters said was an outdated and discriminatory policy.

Obama intends to sign it into law next week, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said. But Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who had pushed for the change, warned gay men and women serving in the military that the current "don't ask, don't tell" policy will remain in effect for some time while the new rules are put in place.

"By ending 'don't ask, don't tell,' no longer will our nation be denied the service of thousands of patriotic Americans forced to leave the military, despite years of exemplary performance, because they happen to be gay. And no longer will many thousands more be asked to live a lie in order to serve the country they love," Obama said in a statement.

The Senate voted 65-31 to end the 17-year-old ban following passage by the Democratic-led House of Representatives. Democratic leaders had pushed for its passage before the end of this session since in January Republicans, many of whom did not support the change, will control the House and will have greater numbers in the Senate.

Gay men and women were barred from serving in the military until 1993, when Democratic President Bill Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy allowed them to serve as long as they kept their sexual orientation secret.

Bolstering the case for ending the policy, which has seen more than 13,000 men and women expelled from the U.S. military, a Pentagon report found that most in the armed services did not object to lifting the ban.

Rick Jacobs, who heads the group Courage Campaign that pushed to end the ban on gay marriage in California, said the move was a major advance for gay rights.

"I look at it as a 100 percent unmitigated success for the movement," Jacobs said. "We are certainly at the end of the beginning, and we may be at the middle of the process as far as total legal equality."

Many of those who were dismissed due to their sexual orientation have said they hope to return to service.

Former Air Force Major Mike Almy, at a news conference with Senate leaders following the vote, said he was dismissed after another officer read his private e-mails to loved ones back home. He had faced mortar attacks while commanding a unit of 200 in Iraq and was recommended to be promoted to Lieutenant Colonel.

"There is nothing more that I want than to resume my career as an officer and a leader in the Air Force," he said.

CHANGE WILL TAKE TIME

Gates and other supporters of the repeal had argued that Congress needed to act if the military was to have time for an orderly transition to the new policy. A U.S. court-ordered end to "don't ask, don't tell" would be disruptive, he said.

The policy faced numerous court challenges.

Gates said in a statement that once Obama signed the bill, the Defense Department would begin immediately with the "planning necessary to carry out this change carefully and methodically, but purposefully."

The legislation gives the Pentagon an undetermined amount of time -- possibly months -- to educate service members and prepare for the policy change before it "certifies" repeal.

"It is therefore important that our men and women in uniform understand that while today's historic vote means that this policy will change, the implementation and certification process will take an additional period of time," Gates said.

"In the meantime, the current law and policy will remain in effect," Gates added.

Opponents of gays serving openly in the military argued that lifting the ban would undermine order and discipline and harm unit cohesiveness, especially among combat troops.

Republican opposition was largely led by Obama's 2008 White House challenger, Senator John McCain, a former Navy pilot and prisoner of war in Vietnam.

McCain said it may be too early to end the ban and challenged the Pentagon's forecast of little impact if the policy were lifted. In a Senate speech, he argued against imposing a change while the country is at war.

"This debate is not about the broader social issues that are being discussed in our society, but what is in the best interest of our military at a time of war," McCain said.

Those favoring repeal contend the ban is discriminatory, denies the military needed soldiers and, in Obama's words, "violates fundamental American principles of fairness."

While Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, advocated repeal, others such as Marine Corps Commandant James Amos expressed concern about the impact on troops serving in combat.

(Additional reporting by Andy Sullivan and Alister Bull in Washington and Peter Henderson in San Francisco, Editing by Jackie Frank)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
Dakotacountry wrote:
There is already a higher percentage of gays in the military versus the general public. The reason why is there is always a certain percentage of gays in the general public that are kind of caught up in where they fit in life and with no children and in most cases no spouse of there own to worry about, careers like the military make a good fit for them. I think the repeal is a good thing for everyone. It makes alot of sense especially at war time to have gays with no children to every worry about to be fighting along with everyone else.It would be a good thing for more on them to serve.

Dec 19, 2010 12:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RP623 wrote:
All the headlines read “repeals ban” but DADT wasn’t a ban at all. It was a compromise. UCMJ (military law) does not allow homosexual behavior. The compromise between Clinton and the military was that gays could serve so long as they kept it under their hat. Now theres no compromise. Meaning UCMJ rules can again kick gays out behavior or no behavior. The repeal of DADT was only the start. Now the President and military have to change military code to actually allow or atleast not disallow gays.

Dec 19, 2010 12:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TxCharlie wrote:
The greatest benefit of this legislation is that it occupied the Lame Ducks’ time so the clock will run out before they can pass more serious and harmful junk legislation.

Every time I hear about this law, I’m reminded of the TV show M.A.S.H., where Corporal Klinger was wearing dresses, boas, and high heels in the middle of the Korean war so they would send him home on a Section 8 medical discharge.

Dec 19, 2010 12:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.