Venezuela tightens Internet regulation

CARACAS Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:49pm EST

Related Topics

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuela's parliament approved tighter regulation of the Internet on Monday in the latest of a package of laws to entrench President Hugo Chavez's socialist "revolution" before a new Assembly is sworn-in next month.

Members of his ruling Socialist Party say the move brings South America's top oil producer into line with international norms for policing the Web. But opposition politicians say it is aimed at stifling dissent.

It followed a more controversial vote by the National Assembly last week that will allow Chavez to bypass the next parliament and rule by decree for 18 months.

The former paratrooper turned populist leader says he needs the wide-ranging powers to deal with a national emergency caused by floods that have killed 40 people and driven nearly 140,000 more from their homes.

But the decision was denounced by furious opposition parties due to take 40 percent of seats in the Assembly beginning on January 5, as well as by the U.S. State Department, which accused Chavez of finding "creative ways" to justify autocratic powers.

The Internet bill approved on Monday prohibits online content attacking "good customs," disrespecting public officials or inciting violence against the president.

Many of Venezuela's lively news forums operate without a moderator or editor filtering out extremist or vulgar content. But the bill has concerned some free speech activists, who have drawn comparisons with how China and Cuba police the Web.

Under the new regulations, all Internet traffic is supposed to pass through a single, government-controlled access point, stoking opposition fears about surveillance and censorship.

Lawmakers who promoted the bill had argued that it would make the Internet faster. But it was not clear how the government planned to undo the communications architecture already in place, or even whether it was technically possible.

(Reporting by Daniel Wallis; Editing by Anthony Boadle)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
quatra wrote:
I don’t think my good friend Hugo will be crying for not having a US ambassador. Oh, and the coffee is very good in Venezuela.

Dec 20, 2010 9:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Nasty_Celt wrote:
It seems truth is treason there just like it is in America.

Dec 21, 2010 1:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
burningtree wrote:
First, it’s dictator-for-a-year (ahemmm…for the rest of his life). Then it’s control over information–for the people’s sake. Gee, I feel like I’m reading Orwell’s 1984. But with communists, it’s always deja vu all over again. And if he were not dangerous, and in cahoots with every one of our enemies, bent on one thing–the destruction of America and human freedom itself–I would find him a laughable self-caricature. But we should take him very seriously, and, once our spineless POTUS is voted out of office, we can treat him seriously. He, and so many others, smell blood in the waters of America, and have come to feed. He–and Iran, and North Korea, and China are the reason we don’t need to let down our nuclear guard. Because they will strike. It is only a matter of time. Doesn’t anybody see a showdown coming between good and evil?

Dec 21, 2010 4:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.