- Debt limit fight could be "catastrophic": Obama aide
- Republicans may starve financial reform of cash
- Republicans to enjoy new clout and face pressure
- House Republicans eye quick repeal of healthcare law
- Most Americans say tax rich to balance budget: poll
- Republican puts crosshairs on Holder over WikiLeaks
Republicans to enjoy new clout and face pressure
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans roared to victory in the November congressional elections by targeting President Barack Obama's fiscal policies and asking, "Where are the jobs?"
Once they take power from Obama's Democrats in the House of Representatives when the new Congress convenes on January 5, they will be held accountable to answer this and other questions.
How will they keep their promise to cut federal spending and reduce the federal deficit? What will they do to pump new life into the sluggish economy still trying to recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression? Will they raise the federal debt limit or threaten a government default?
"The problem Republicans face is that they'll be held responsible, and it's virtually impossible to meet the demands of the American people," said Paul Sracic, a political scientist at Youngstown State University in Ohio.
"The big issue is the economy but no one is predicting a rapid drop in the (U.S.) jobless rate," now at a stubbornly high 9.8 percent, Sracic said.
Republicans campaigned on promises to curb federal regulations, freeze the non-security federal workforce and reduce federal spending to 2008 levels, with exceptions for the elderly, the U.S. military and veterans. It is unclear whether any of these, even if enacted, would create any jobs in the short-run though.
Already sounding defensive, Republicans point out that they are not solely in charge, giving them limited power to turn the economy around.
"We will bring legislation to the House that is pro-growth legislation. But last I looked, Barack Obama was still president; last I looked, (Democrat) Harry Reid was still Senate majority leader. As we all know, our ability to actually pass laws is going to be somewhat constrained," said Jeb Hensarling, a conservative member of the House Republican leadership.
With the conservative Tea Party movement helping fan anti-establishment fire, scores of Democrats were thrown out of Congress in November. Voters gave Republicans a strong majority in the House and narrowed the Democrats' Senate majority to 53-47.
Still, a December Washington Post-ABC News poll showed Obama is trusted more than congressional Republicans -- 43 percent to 38 percent -- "to do a better job coping" with the nation's problems. That could help stiffen Democrats' resolve to block some Republican bills.
FINGER POINTING OR COMPROMISE?
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has already drawn fire for saying his top objective is to deny Obama a second term.
As Republicans tried blocking major Obama initiatives in the final days of last year's Congress, McConnell quipped to news service Politico, "If they think it's bad now, wait till next year."
"There will be a lot of finger-pointing," said Larry Sabato, a political science professor at the University of Virginia. "The winner will be the best finger-pointer."
With their 242-193 majority, Republicans will have the votes to pass their entire campaign agenda through the House. Whether any of their efforts succeed in the Democratic-led Senate could depend on Obama's willingness to move to the political center to find common ground.
That's what he did in the weeks after the November election when he reached a $858 billion deal to extend expiring tax cuts for millions of Americans for two years -- a high-stakes gamble to create jobs at a cost of deepening the U.S. debt.
Whether or not Republicans and Democrats reach agreement on economic policy in the coming year, there are some signs the U.S. economy is perking up. Government figures show consumer spending is up and new claims for jobless benefits are down.
According to a Reuters poll of economists released on December 15, the economy in 2011 will register year-on-year growth of 2.7 percent, strengthening into the second half of the year.
Hensarling previewed where the next battles could be fought: "Making current tax rates permanent" and repealing Obama's healthcare law, which he argued is creating uncertainty in the business community and discouraging job growth.
Neither of these initiatives is seen as having much chance of passing Congress and some analysts question whether Republicans will seriously pursue either.
Other legislation that Hensarling said would create jobs: fundamental tax reform and dealing with long-term deficits -- both topics that Obama also has been raising.
But within the Republican Party, there is some skepticism about whether Republican initiatives in Congress will actually translate into more American jobs.
Reuters asked Representative Mike Simpson, who is poised to head a powerful House Appropriations panel next year, which Republican initiatives will create jobs by the end of 2011.
"Good question. I'll have to think about that," he said, adding that he didn't just want to give a "routine" answer.
(Additional reporting by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Jackie Frank)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
About the politicians:
Mitch McConnell said his one goal is to “…see that Obama serves only one term.” Even if you agree, what that says is that he is more concerned about his own political party’s skin than any of the public’s concerns. The resistance to the START treaty didn’t make any sense and was almost treasonous. Their opposition vanished when more money was allocated for “nuclear enhancement”!!! Rand Paul said he would have opposed the Civil Rights Act. That’s going way too far. We needed and still do, that law. There’s also been talk about not funding the “Wall Street Reform Act”. Why??? That also makes no sense, but implies really close and personal ties to a business sector that shares a large part of the fault of the recession, and smacks of cronyism. Then there’s this talk by Boener of repealing the Health Care law, when the WHOLE PURPOSE of the Act is to reduce the cost of health care and bring our deficit down, and according to the CBO will do just that. The law itself, simply put, regulates the private insurance industry, and prohibits unfair practices. While some of the provisions may seem onerous, we absolutely needed to do something. Did you know that 55 other countries provide some form of universal health care for their people, and that the U.S. is ranked behind about 36 others in health care performance? We do NOT have the best health care in the world.
I guess what I’m saying is that while I’m a conservative, I think government has a function in providing a peaceful, healthy and safe environment for our society, and that some politicians are banging on the “fear mongering”, “less tax” and “big government” drums for political gain at the expense of our own economic well being. Less tax is good, but as responsible conservatives we need to stop borrowing and start paying for what we get.
About the comments:
Many of the negative comments I see demonstrate a lack of knowledge. Sorry about that, but catch phrases like “Obamacare”, “Obummer” “African” and “tax and spend” really have no meaning and leave the reader cold and unsure about your point.
Fact is…our Republican politicians do spend more than the Democrats. I don’t like that. The last “true” republican goes back to Eisenhower. This current bunch don’t seem to know what they are about, except getting elected.
So, if you have Democrat representatives, tell them to work with the Republicans to reduce the deficit. If you have Republican representative, tell them to pay for what they vote for and stop the wars. Regardless, tell them to support the recommendations of the Deficit Commission.
Lastly, if you haven’t written your representatives, you don’t deserve to comment here.


Follow Reuters