Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rebel fighter training

Training new recruits to Congo's M23 insurgent group.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Pentagon cuts to reflect Gates, White House tussle

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Jan 4, 2011 7:22pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates has been successfully pushing back against White House attempts to more severely cut into weapons program funding than what the Pentagon had been bracing for, an analyst and defense company source said on Tuesday.

Gates is due to brief lawmakers on Thursday about his drive to find $100 billion in savings over five years from overhead and unnecessary programs, congressional aides said on Tuesday.

Gates had hoped to plow the savings back into the Pentagon budget for troop costs and weapons programs. But the White House recently has been pressing Gates to make even bigger cuts of about $150 billion, and then use the money to help narrow huge federal deficits.

Gates has whittled the proposed cut down to around $80 billion, said defense analyst Loren Thompson, chief operating officer of the Virginia-based Lexington Institute, who was briefed on the communication between the Pentagon and White House.

Gates will explain the efficiency drive to lawmakers on Thursday morning before announcing the measures at a Pentagon briefing, the congressional aides said.

Congress ultimately has to approve Obama's budget proposal and the Pentagon's suggested program cuts.

The defense company source, who was not authorized to speak about the budget negotiations, said Gates took the issue all the way to President Barack Obama, and while he managed to shrink the size of the demanded cuts, it was clear that the Pentagon would not be allowed to keep all the savings it had found.

"The American people will be asked to make painful compromises on tax increases, Medicare cuts and Social Security. It's clear that the Defense Department will have to surrender some portion of its planned growth as well," said defense consultant Jim McAleese on Tuesday. "That is still preferable than a dramatic defense contraction."

Gates, whose office has said he intends to retire in 2011, had some leverage in budget negotiations because "the White House is trying to convince him to stay through the end of the president's first term," Thompson said on Tuesday.

Gates is expected to announce on Thursday the end of a program for the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, a 40-ton amphibious landing craft that General Dynamics Corp is developing for the Marine Corps at a cost of over $13 billion, said two defense company officials and a congressional source, none of whom were authorized to speak on the record.

The Pentagon also is likely to cancel a surface-launched missile system being developed by Raytheon Co, and further extend the development phase of the Pentagon's largest arms program, the Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, for up to two years, one of the defense company sources said.

Pentagon officials thought the administration would ask Congress for $566 billion in military spending in fiscal 2012, not counting overseas fighting, but the White House budget office is now pressing for a figure of $554 billion with more cuts to come later, Thompson said.

The White House has said it would release its proposed budget for fiscal year 2012 during the week of February 14.

One administration official, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said on Tuesday it was premature to talk about specific proposals or numbers in the budget.

"As the president has said, this will take shared sacrifice -- so that we can focus our resources on what is critical to growing the economy, spurring job creation, and making the United States more competitive," the official said.

(Additional reporting by Andy Sullivan) (Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; editing by Carol Bishopric)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
msfunkadellic wrote:
New guidelines for the money’s spent on contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan would certainly help. There is so much waste in those two war zones. But, do not let the US soldier be left without proper equipments like the Brits.
Mr. Gates-support the US soldier before, during and after service.
For instance, the veterans administration should support and treat the soldiers fully that have received traumatic brain injuries-
What happened there? First you don’t provide roadside bomb proof vehicles and then they are injured and you decide not to pay for their treatment and rehab?
Bad decision, an insult to our troops. They deserve so much better.

Jan 04, 2011 8:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
txgadfly wrote:
How about suspending all pay and benefits and benefit accrual for officers at rank Major and above if they complete 24 hours in either Iraq or Afghanistan during a calendar year? How else will we get out of there in the next 100 years?

Jan 04, 2011 10:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
Defense and education spending will have to be cut dramatically too! Almost $5 Billion PER DAY in deficit spending this year folks!! A $5 Billion per YEAR Fed pay freeze won’t cut it-one days deficit spending? Doesn’t include the National Debt or massive, widespread state debt or unfunded entitlements 80 million boomers are about to spike!!! Thge cuts happen now or the ugly civil unrest will unfold-and thta’ll add to the deficit/debt and suffering!! Make the cuts now and taxes will have to rise too-we’ve waited much too long!

Jan 05, 2011 2:01pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.