Seoul rejects North Korea's talks offer as "propaganda"

SEOUL Thu Jan 6, 2011 4:29pm EST

A South Korean army's AH-1S helicopter fires a missile during a live fire drill in Yangpyeong, east of Seoul, January 6, 2011. REUTERS/Han Sang-gyun/Yonhap

A South Korean army's AH-1S helicopter fires a missile during a live fire drill in Yangpyeong, east of Seoul, January 6, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Han Sang-gyun/Yonhap

SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korea has dismissed a North Korean call for unconditional talks to ease tensions, saying on Thursday the offer was "propaganda" it does not take seriously.

The North's move on Wednesday came as the United States met Chinese and South Korean officials for talks on how to calm the Korean peninsula and persuade the North to stop its nuclear work.

Seoul, which wants an apology after North Korea's deadly shelling of a South Korean island off disputed waters in November, said Pyongyang's call for talks was an empty gesture.

"North Korea previously issued statements like this early in the year ... they are normally done as part of (a) propaganda campaign toward the South," a Unification Ministry official said.

"We do not consider this is as a serious proposal for dialogue. It is not even in the correct and appropriate format."

The artillery fire, and the March 2010 sinking of a South Korean ship blamed on the North despite its denials, have raised tension in Asia and increased the pressure to resume talks.

Washington, which is urging Beijing to rein in its ally North Korea, has sent its envoy Stephen Bosworth to Asia for talks. He is in China on Thursday and will be in Japan on Friday.

In Washington, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and visiting Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara repeated that North Korea must cease its provocative behavior for progress to be made in calming tensions.

Analysts say Pyongyang's military aggression and unveiling of a previously-undisclosed nuclear enrichment facility are ways of raising the stakes ahead of potential six-party talks, a forum in which it has previously won substantial aid.

"Both sides had a deep exchange of views on the situation on the Korean peninsula and on the six-party talks," China's Foreign Ministry said after Bosworth met with officials.

"Both sides agreed to continue working hard to maintain peace and stability on the Korean peninsula and to push forward the six-party talk process."

Although both Koreas have called for dialogue to solve the crisis, the South, like Washington, is loath to be seen rewarding the North's actions with the talks and concessions it desires.

TALKS OR TENSIONS?

"Whether this (North-South) exchange is a sincere step back from the brink or simply a pause before a new round of tension is still uncertain," Abraham Kim and Jack Pritchard from the Korea Economic Institute wrote in a note.

"It is not the first time for Pyongyang to be more reconciliatory after a series of provocations."

Pyongyang walked out of the aid-for-disarmament talks with the South, United States, Russia, Japan and China in 2008. It then expelled U.N. atomic monitors and had a second nuclear test.

Pyongyang's offer for talks was run on the North's official KCNA news agency which said the statement, in an unusual step, was issued collectively by the North's government, the ruling Workers' Party of Korea and other organizations.

"We call for an unconditional and early opening of talks between the authorities having real power and responsibility," the statement said.

The South Korean official said the North was using the statement for domestic purposes and that Pyongyang needed to convince the outside world that it was serious.

"The North needs to show, not simply by making offers for dialogue, that it is genuine in its intentions, in the wake of the series of events that have taken place."

The United States suggested the North must first stop provoking its neighbor, recommit to a 2005 nuclear pact and take responsibility for recent attacks.

"We are determined to move forward, to end the provocative behavior, and to once again focus on the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula," Clinton said on Thursday.

"What is important is for the DPRK (North Korea) to take concrete actions with sincerity, with good faith," Japan's Maehara said, adding that if North Korea took demonstrable steps there would be "no reason to reject" a resumption of the six-party dialogue.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he planned to discuss North Korea, along with other issues including Iran, when he visited China from Jan 9-12.

"I think expanding that dialogue is really important," Gates said.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Quinn and Phil Stewart in Washingtohn, Ben Blanchard in Beijing; Editing by Daniel Magnowski and Paul Simao)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
John-B wrote:
The south most certainly reads this correctly. By now they and the world have learned about the north’s duplicity in such circumstances as these. The north’s rhetoric, good or bad, means nothing. The assignment of creating in the north a responsible member of the community of nations must remain with the north’s mentor and only means of survival – China.

Jan 06, 2011 4:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
SportsCar39 wrote:
After reading some of the articals out on the web, I have since become curious about how North Korea could have advanced to the point that they have built a previously-undisclosed nuclear enrichment facility. This must have taken a lot of technoligy know how which I wonder how North Korea could have got with all the sanctions that are set up in order to prevent them from getting this knowledge.

I hope that the U.S. and South Korea can find out who gave North Korea this knowledge. I hope that China is not behine giving North Korea the Nucleear information in order to preasure the U.S and South Korea to start the talks back up again. China deep down knows that North Korea is responsible for sinking the South Korean ship back in March 2010. Also, there is no reaserch necessary to determine that North Korea was at fault for starting the bombing of the South Korean Island in November 2010. China should be working to get North Korea to start living up to there past promises and get them to apologies for the two incidents.Then and only then can the talks start up again in order to bring North Korea up to the 21st century and back to the world and the Human Race!!!!

Jan 06, 2011 5:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
kc10man wrote:
Hmm…. Did Seoul seek council from Boeing before rejecting talks?

Jan 06, 2011 5:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures