Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

EPA "pollution diet" starves agriculture: farm group

Related Topics

ATLANTA | Sun Jan 9, 2011 6:18pm EST

ATLANTA (Reuters) - The head of the largest U.S. farm group called on Congress to stop ruinous EPA "over-regulation" of agriculture and announced on Sunday a lawsuit against EPA rules to reduce Chesapeake Bay pollution.

Bob Stallman, president of the 6 million-member American Farm Bureau Federation, announced the lawsuit during a speech that opened the group's annual meeting. He said the Environmental Protection Agency's "over-regulation endangers our industry."

Farmers have been leery of EPA for years. Opposition has grown in the past couple of years out of concern that regulation of greenhouse gases will drive up farming expenses and that EPA may tell farmers to limit dust from fields.

"Our message to the new Congress is clear: It is time to stop the EPA," said Stallman. "But we don't intend to leave this to Congress alone. We are prepared to carry this battle to the courts."

A lawsuit will be filed on Monday in U.S. District Court in Scranton, Pennsylvania, to block the Chesapeake Bay "pollution diet" announced by EPA on December 29, he told reporters later.

The "diet" calls for a 25 percent reduction in nitrogen, 24 percent reduction in phosphorus and 20 percent reduction in sediment runoff by 2025. Six states -- Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia -- and the District of Columbia are obliged to impose new controls on wastewater and storm water runoff from cities and on agricultural runoff.

Mandatory controls on agriculture are possible in Delaware, Maryland, Virginia and New York state by 2013 if pollution reductions fall behind schedule, says EPA.

Stallman said "this diet threatens to starve agriculture out of the entire 64,000 square-mile Chesapeake Bay watershed." EPA puts too much emphasis on agricultural runoff and is too forgiving of pollution from urban development, he said.

Asked to name the biggest issue for U.S. farmers, Stallman said, "I think the biggest battles in 2011 will be regulatory."

During his keynote speech, Stallman said the farm sector has increased crop and livestock productivity dramatically since 1950. Farmers produce 262 percent food and use slightly fewer "inputs," such as fertilizer, pesticides and fuel, he said, but some regulators "are ready to downsize American agriculture, mothball our productivity and out-source our farms."

AFBF delegates, who set the organization's policy, are expected to approve a resolution on Tuesday asking lawmakers to rein in EPA.

"We think that agency is out of control right now and is throwing everything but the kitchen sink at agriculture," said Phil Nelson, president of the Illinois Farm Bureau.

The new Republican chairman of the House Agriculture Committee says EPA proposals on spray drift and farm dust as topics for congressional review this year.

(Reporting by Charles Abbott; Editing by Diane Craft)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Alexander_Sr wrote:
Won’t make much difference in 50 years when Chesapeake Bay and all the agricultural land around it are under water.

Jan 09, 2011 6:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
McBob08 wrote:
If farmers want the EPA to remove their regulations, then they should give up their huge government farm subsidies as well. You can’t hold one hand out for government hand-outs and then shake your fist at the government for the regulations that go with those hand-outs. If you give up one, then you have to give up both.

Give the factory farmers that ultimatum, and watch how fast they change their tune!

Jan 09, 2011 7:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
A group of agribusiness creeps expressing fear that satisfaction of their greed may be diminished by laws affecting environment in a postive manner – something they care little about.

Jan 09, 2011 8:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.