Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Biden: U.S. could stay in Afghanistan beyond 2014

Related Topics

Related Video

1 of 4. U.S soldier stands guard as the U.S military Chinook helicopter carrying U.S Vice President Joe Biden prepares to land in Wardak province January 11, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Omar Sobhani

KABUL | Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:26pm EST

KABUL (Reuters) - The United States is not in Afghanistan to "govern," but will stay beyond a scheduled 2014 security handover if Afghans want, visiting U.S. Vice President Joe Biden told President Hamid Karzai on Tuesday.

Seeking to reassure the Afghan leader, who has accused Washington in the past of meddling, Biden said Afghans were capable of building their own institutions and the United States was not in the war-torn country to "nation-build."

"We are not leaving if you don't want us to leave. We plan on continuing to work with you and it's in the mutual self-interest of both nations," he said.

The visit was Biden's first trip to Afghanistan as vice president. He has been openly critical of Karzai in the past, questioning the Afghan leader's credibility as a partner and accusing him of doing little to tackle corruption.

A senior administration official said the two leaders' meetings with staff and one-on-one had gone well.

"The tone was excellent, a productive and positive meeting and my understanding is the same was true of their one on one," the official said.

It comes after the bloodiest year of the nearly decade-long war in Afghanistan, with violence at its worst since U.S.-led Afghan forces overthrew the Taliban in late 2001 following the September 11 attacks on the United States.

"It is not our intention to govern or to nation-build. This is the responsibility of the Afghan people and they are fully capable of it," Biden said in a press statement after talks and lunch with Karzai.

A war review by U.S. President Barack Obama in December said "notable operational gains" had been made and the Taliban's momentum arrested in much of the country and reversed in some areas, but any gains were fragile and reversible.

The review also said the United States was on track to begin gradually withdrawing its troops -- numbering about 97,000 out of some 150,000 foreign troops -- in July.

The reduction is part of an ambitious NATO-backed plan for Afghans to take the lead in securing the whole country in 2014.

"The vice president was simply restating for the public what he had said to the president, which was that the US wants an enduring partnership with Afghanistan," the administration official said.

Biden said U.S. forces had made progress against militant insurgents, but for these advances to hold, Afghanistan needed to take responsibility for its own security and Pakistan should do more to stop the Taliban.

"NOT LEAVING"

Biden said the United States would remain in Afghanistan beyond the 2014 handover deadline if the Afghans wanted.

"Hopefully, we will have totally turned over the ability ... to the Afghan security forces to maintain the security of the country, but we are not leaving if you don't want us to leave," he said.

Media reports have long portrayed Biden as skeptical of a large military presence in Afghanistan, favoring a narrower counterterrorism mission of pursuing al Qaeda targets in Pakistan and on the Afghan border. Tuesday's comments may be viewed as a softening of that line.

For his part, Karzai has accused Washington and its allies of interfering in his affairs.

Relations hit a low last year when Karzai accused Western governments of ballot-rigging in an August 2009 presidential poll in an effort to install a weak government.

Biden and Karzai met for longer than scheduled at the presidential palace. Both later gave upbeat assessments of their talks. Biden was whisked away without taking questions from reporters.

(Additional reporting by Michelle Nichols and Hamid Shalizi; Writing by Jonathon Burch; Editing by Robert Birsel and Maria Golovnina)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
txgadfly wrote:
Why not stay until after 2114? Why not 2214? Who cares what the American people think, since they are not given the choice to get out? Why not have more politicians elected to end a war agree to make it war without end?

Well the war is fought with borrowed money. Money borrowed on the faith of the American people. And the war is clearly against the will of the American people and has been for years. We will not pay the debts of people who fight wars by seizing control of elections. Rigging elections before the ballot is cast is in no way ethically superior to rigging an election after ballots are cast. Asking the people who deny the people their sovereignty if it is “ok” is stupid.

When their control fails, the money lent to them can be collected from them, not from the rest of us. No freedom, no responsibility, no repayment.

Jan 11, 2011 1:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
paccrab wrote:
The US is a stupid dude, we are wasting precious dollars on useless wars. Any smart person would have learned the bitter and costly lesson of Vietnam (55000 lives wasted for what?). Now the leaders want another long war. The money should have been spent at home on infrastructure to make a better country and for college education to make the pop smart and productive.

Jan 11, 2011 6:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MrEz wrote:
The step up needs to be pumped up as the US is economically fragile and needs its resources within to repair a long history of fiscal idiocy.

Jan 11, 2011 10:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.