Afghan campaign caused $100 million damage: inquiry

Related Topics

Related Video

A bullet hole is seen in a window of a building where the office of private armoured car company Tiger International is located, after a raid on the office by NATO forces in Kabul December 27, 2010. REUTERS/Ahmad Masood

A bullet hole is seen in a window of a building where the office of private armoured car company Tiger International is located, after a raid on the office by NATO forces in Kabul December 27, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Ahmad Masood

KABUL | Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:19pm EST

KABUL (Reuters) - Afghan and foreign forces have caused more than $100 million damage to fruit crops and homes during security operations in southern Kandahar province, a government delegation said on Tuesday.

Tens of thousands of foreign and Afghan troops are deployed in Kandahar, a traditional stronghold of the Afghan Taliban, where they have been conducting military offensives over the past year.

Violence is at its worst since U.S.-backed Afghan forces overthrew the Islamist government in 2001 after it refused to hand over al Qaeda militants, including Osama bin Laden, after the September 11 attacks on the United States.

The government delegation, led by President Hamid Karzai's adviser, Mohammad Sadiq Aziz, said Afghan and foreign forces caused unreasonable damage to homes and orchards, just as the harvest was about to begin, and displaced a number of people.

ISAF was not immediately available for comment on the report by the government delegation, which presented its findings to Karzai on Tuesday.

"The Omid (Hope) military operation, which has been going on for some time in Arghandab, Zhari, and Panjwai districts, has inflicted severe damage to the people," Aziz said in a statement released by Karzai's office.

Aziz said several Afghans detained by foreign troops during the operation had been released after requests were made by the government delegation.

But Zalmai Ayoubi, spokesman for the governor of Kandahar, said the Taliban booby-trapped the orchards and empty houses of people who had fled ahead of security operations and that troops had no choice but to blow up those sites.

He said the claims by the villagers about the cost of the damages were highly exaggerated.

In November, the Afghan Rights Monitor (ARM), a human rights group, reported widespread damage to hundreds of houses in the same three districts, home to about 300,000 of the province's more than one million inhabitants.

It said foreign forces had used aerial bombing to strike Taliban strongholds and to set off mines and homemade bombs sometimes hidden as booby traps in private homes.

(Reporting by Hamid Shalizi; Writing by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Ron Popeski)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
msfunkadellic wrote:
Unfortunately this is true. To replace these homes and fields takes years and the families are not compensated for their loses properly. I have built an adobe home and garden wall there and even that is expensive, let alone the cost of replacing baked brick and plaster homes and security walls. This new inflated ecomomy that is a result of all the foreigners makes replacing basic building materials very expensive and the orchards are irreplaceable, that takes years and years.The villagers do not know how to even speak to the military to ask for compensation and really have to flee to a different area altogether to protect their children from ” mistakes” made by the forces or escape from the talibs that threaten them.
The civilian villagers that have no part in this are taking the brunt of the action and will really suffer after the forces pull out as planned.
This is a disaster for the rural poor in southern Afghanistan.
Bush 41 and Clinton should have gone in with reconstructive help in the 90’s to stop the growth of the terrorist groups that everyone knew were there and organizing.

Jan 11, 2011 11:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
ROWnine wrote:
Sent the bill to al qaeda and the taliban once they open their offices. Neither has had its Ministry of Silly We Don’t Understand the Concept of War (MSWDUCW)trials, buy uniforms or spend more than the cost of a few rounds to convince their constituents to join up.

Jan 11, 2011 9:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mmc46 wrote:
They want our help over there. Now if this is the way it’s going to be. Recall all our troops. Cut off all trade to this Country. Quit sending them money. Send them the bill for it cost billions for Canada to fight this terrorism for them. Then they probably just hand it over to the Terrorist anyway. Many of these people can not be trusted. Like before all this got started how many billions over the years have we sent to this Country and others in aid and they haven’t improved.

Jan 13, 2011 6:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.